OpenNAOE homeHydrostatics & StabilityChapter 13Version 1.0 Send feedback

Figures and tables have more room in landscape.

Chapter 13: Partially supported ships: docking, grounding and launching

Version 1.0 · last revised 5 November 2026 · corrections

Prologue: the yacht Baaden at Anacortes

On the evening of 18 May 2014 the new motor yacht Baaden was launched from the boat ramp of the Fidalgo Marina at Anacortes, in the state of Washington1. It was a composite yacht 85 ft (25.9 m) long and 20.75 ft (6.32 m) wide, displacing 345,280 lb (156.6 t) at a draught of 7.17 ft (2.19 m), and it had been built at Anacortes by New World Yacht Builders1,1.

The yacht had been brought to the head of the ramp bow first, turned through 90° and then let down the ramp stern first on three wheeled dollies, held back by steel cables from a crane that a wrecker anchored at the top1. Two of the dollies, tied together, carried an aft cradle with wooden blocks on both sides of the hull to keep the yacht from rolling. The third stood just aft of the bow thruster and carried a small cradle in which the forward end of the keel rested, and the investigators noted that this forward cradle did not prevent the yacht from rolling1. The upper part of the ramp was 40 ft (12.2 m) wide and sloped down at about 6.5°, and the launch had been timed for a high tide of 8.5 ft (2.59 m) predicted for 9.45 p.m.1,1.

The launch began at about 7 p.m. and was halted at about 8.15 p.m. at the water’s edge, where eight people went aboard to ride it into the water. At about 8.37 p.m., some 40 seconds after the forward dolly had gone completely under water, the yacht shifted bodily on the forward cradle, rolled to port and came to rest heeled about 12° to that side1. It was then still carried mainly by the aft cradle. The tyres of that cradle’s dollies had probably run off the side of the upper ramp and dropped the cradle to port, and the roll was probably stopped only because the yacht’s port stabilizer fin came down on the ramp1. No leak was found, and about 12 minutes later the team went on, backing the yacht down the ramp and off the aft cradle with its own engines while the fin dragged on the ramp. At about 8.50 p.m., with some 7.8 ft (2.38 m) of water at the end of the upper ramp, the yacht moved to port again, slipped off the forward cradle and heeled further1. Ballast and equipment that had not been secured shifted, water came in through the air intakes of its engines, and it settled on the bottom of the marina with a list of about 65° to port1. Five of the eight were trapped below in the engine spaces and were pulled out through a washroom portlight, and the yacht, valued at about 10 million US dollars, was a total constructive loss1,1.

The National Transportation Safety Board found that the yacht had been launched with a small margin of stability. At its final weighing the aft starboard load cell had read 60,550 lb (27.47 t), but 68,500 lb (31.07 t) had been passed to the naval architect. Its starboard side had therefore been taken as heavier than it was, and its centre of gravity lay further to port than he had estimated. Only 16.61 long tons (16.88 t) of ballast had been fitted, against the 23 long tons (23.37 t) assumed in his calculations, and no calculation had been made of its stability on the inclined ramp1. The test that was to measure its stability was planned for after the launch1. The Board gave as the probable cause the yacht’s low margin of stability, which followed from the recording error at the final weighing and from an overestimate of the ballast installed1.

The yacht capsized during a planned operation in the sheltered water of a marina, at the stage at which its stern had begun to float while the forward end of its keel still rested on a cradle. Many launching and docking operations pass through stages of this sort, and a ship that runs aground may be held in a similar way, with part of its weight carried by something other than the water.

In this chapter we will see how a support under the keel changes the equilibrium and the stability of a ship, and why a ship that rests partly on a support has less stability than it has afloat. We will follow docking, grounding and launching as naval architects plan and check them, and return to the Baaden in Sec. 13.7.5, once the stages of a launch have been followed.

In this chapter

By the end of this chapter you will be able to:

What it assumes. You need Eqs. (5.2) and (6.7), since the support is treated as a weight removed, and the methods of lost buoyancy and added weight of Chapter 12.

A first reading. Sections 13.1 to 13.3, 13.5 and 13.7 carry the main thread. The floating docks of Sec. 13.4 and the refloating of Sec. 13.6 are particular operations treated by the methods of the main thread and can wait for a second reading.

13.1 The partly supported ship

13.1.1 Equilibrium of a supported ship

A ship floating freely carries two vertical forces, its weight Δ acting downwards through G and the buoyancy acting upwards through B, and in equilibrium they are equal and lie on one vertical. When part of its bottom rests on something solid, such as a keel block in a dock, a rock or a bank, or the ways on which it was built, a third force acts on it. This is the upward reaction of the support, the support force P, at the point of contact C, a distance xCx_C forward of the AP and a height zCz_C above the baseline. P is a force, like Δ. Where the balance is made in tonnes, as in the examples and in most of practice, it is written as the mass Pm=P/gP_m = P/g, like Δm\Delta_m, and forces and masses are not mixed in one equation. The mass PmP_m is the part of the ship’s mass that the support carries, and a moment of such masses, in t·m, is the moment of the forces divided by gg.

With part of its weight carried by the support, the water need only carry the rest, and the ship floats at a smaller displacement Δ1\Delta_1, with its centre of buoyancy at B1\mathrm{B}_1. The forces must balance vertically,

Δ1+P=Δ,(13.1)\Delta_1 + P = \Delta , \qquad (13.1)

and their moments about any transverse axis must cancel. About the axis through C, where P has no moment,

Δ1(xB1−xC)=Δ(xG−xC),(13.2)\Delta_1\,(x_{B1} - x_C) = \Delta\,(x_G - x_C) , \qquad (13.2)

where xB1x_{B1} and xGx_G are the longitudinal positions of B1\mathrm{B}_1 and G, measured horizontally; for the small trims of most supported ships they may be measured along the ship. The ship trims until B1\mathrm{B}_1 satisfies Eq. (13.2), and B1\mathrm{B}_1 no longer lies under G. With a support at the after end of the keel, B1\mathrm{B}_1 lies forward of G, and the larger P is, the further forward it lies. In Fig. 13.1(a) the Series 60 ship rests in this way on a keel block at the after end of its keel, as it does while a dock is pumped out.

Two panels in rows. (a) The Series 60 ship in profile, heights three times as large as lengths, trimmed by the stern with the after end of its keel resting on the first of a row of keel blocks on the dock floor; the rest of the keel slopes up from the blocks towards the bow. The water level in the dock lies above the blocks. A black arrow points down from G, labelled delta, the weight. A blue arrow points up from B1, a little forward of G and lower, labelled delta 1 equals delta minus P, the buoyancy, at B1. An orange arrow points up at the after end of the keel, labelled P, the support, at C. (b) The midship section of the ship seen from aft, at true scale, heeled 9 degrees to starboard about the keel, which rests on a single block. The water level is horizontal. The ship’s centreline, dash-dotted, passes through K on the block, G above it and M1 higher still. A black arrow points down from G, labelled delta. A blue arrow points up along the vertical through M1, labelled delta minus P, through M1. An orange arrow points up at K, labelled P at K. Port is on the left and starboard on the right.

Figure 13.1 The three forces on a ship resting on a block at the after end of its keel: (a) the Series 60 ship at 3407 t, heights three times as large as lengths; (b) its midship section seen from aft, heeled by φ, at true scale. M1\mathrm{M}_1 is the metacentre of the waterline at which it floats.

13.1.2 The support as a weight removed

The support relieves the water of a part of the ship’s weight, and as far as the floating position of the ship is concerned the support acts exactly as a weight P removed from the ship at C. The ship rises and trims in the way found in Chapter 6 for a mass discharged at xCx_C, Eqs. (6.7) and (6.8): a support aft of the centre of flotation F trims it by the head, and a support forward of F trims it by the stern. The force on a docked ship is commonly found in this way, from the change of trim that it produces2,3.

For the stability of the ship, the support can be counted in two ways. It can be kept as a force on a ship whose weight is unchanged, with the whole displacement Δ3, while the buoyancy that holds it up is smaller and acts through the metacentre of the waterline at which it floats4. Since the whole weight is kept, this count is called here the weight basis. The support can also be taken as a weight removed at the point of contact, as in Chapter 5, Eq. (5.2). G then rises to a virtual position GP\mathrm{G}_P, and the displacement falls to the buoyancy that remains3,4, Δ1=Δ−P\Delta_1 = \Delta - P. This count is the buoyancy basis. The weight basis corresponds to the method of lost buoyancy of Chapter 12, which also keeps the weight of the ship, and the buoyancy basis to the method of added weight, which changes it. Those two methods put identical forces on a flooded ship and gave different metacentric heights with a single righting moment, Eq. (12.7). The two bases of a supported ship behave in this way too.

A body that rests on the bottom with no water under part of its surface receives no upward pressure there, and the water above presses it onto the bottom5. Under a ship on keel blocks or on a narrow rock the water reaches almost the whole bottom. The buoyancy of the ship is that of the immersed hull, and the support carries only the difference between its weight and that buoyancy.

13.2 Stability with a support at the keel

13.2.1 The righting moment of a supported ship

Consider the ship of Fig. 13.1(b), supported on its centreline at K, the point of the keel on the baseline, by a support narrow enough to give no resistance to heel, as a keel block or a ridge of rock does. Let it heel through a small angle φ, positive with the starboard side down, about a longitudinal axis. The support stays at K, the weight Δ acts down through G, and the buoyancy Δ1\Delta_1 acts up through the metacentre M1\mathrm{M}_1 of the waterline at which it floats. The height of M1\mathrm{M}_1 above the keel, KM1\mathrm{KM}_1, is the KM of that waterline. Taking moments about K, where P has no moment, the righting moment is

MR=(Δ1KM1−ΔKG)sinφ,(13.3)M_R = \left(\Delta_1\,\mathrm{KM}_1 - \Delta\,\mathrm{KG}\right)\sin\varphi , \qquad (13.3)

in kN·m, and the upright ship is locally stable while the bracket is positive. For small angles the bracket is the righting moment per radian of heel, called here the righting-moment coefficient. No choice of displacement enters Eq. (13.3), and the two bases follow by rearranging it2,5.

Weight basis. With Δ1=Δ−P\Delta_1 = \Delta - P, and with GM1=KM1−KG\mathrm{GM}_1 = \mathrm{KM}_1 - \mathrm{KG} the metacentric height of the ship at the supported waterline with its real G, Eq. (13.3) can be written

MR=[Δ(KM1−KG)−PKM1]sinφ=ΔGMesinφ,GMe=GM1−PKM1Δ.(13.4)M_R = \left[\Delta\,(\mathrm{KM}_1 - \mathrm{KG}) - P\,\mathrm{KM}_1\right]\sin\varphi = \Delta\,\mathrm{GM}_e\sin\varphi , \qquad \mathrm{GM}_e = \mathrm{GM}_1 - \frac{P\,\mathrm{KM}_1}{\Delta} . \qquad (13.4)

GMe\mathrm{GM}_e is the effective metacentric height of the supported ship on the basis of the whole displacement. In Fig. 13.2(a) the support P at K and the buoyancy Δ−P\Delta - P through M1\mathrm{M}_1 are replaced by their resultant, a force Δ acting upwards through a point M′ that lies PKM1/ΔP\,\mathrm{KM}_1/\Delta below M1\mathrm{M}_1, and the righting couple is formed by Δ through M′ and Δ through G3.

Buoyancy basis. When P is taken as a weight removed at K, a mass −Pm-P_m at z=0z = 0 in Eq. (5.2), G rises to

KGP=ΔKGΔ−P,MR=(Δ−P)GPM1sinφ,GPM1=KM1−KGP.(13.5)\mathrm{KG}_P = \frac{\Delta\,\mathrm{KG}}{\Delta - P} , \qquad M_R = (\Delta - P)\,\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1\sin\varphi , \qquad \mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 = \mathrm{KM}_1 - \mathrm{KG}_P . \qquad (13.5)

In Fig. 13.2(b) the weight Δ at G and the support P at K are replaced by their resultant, a downward force Δ−P\Delta - P at GP\mathrm{G}_P. With the buoyancy Δ−P\Delta - P through M1\mathrm{M}_1 it forms the righting couple3,4.

Multiplying out shows that ΔGMe\Delta\,\mathrm{GM}_e and (Δ−P)GPM1(\Delta - P)\,\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 both equal the righting-moment coefficient Δ1KM1−ΔKG\Delta_1\,\mathrm{KM}_1 - \Delta\,\mathrm{KG}, and the three forms describe a single righting moment. The two virtual losses of metacentric height, PKM1/ΔP\,\mathrm{KM}_1/\Delta on the weight basis and the rise of G, GGP=PKG/(Δ−P)\mathrm{GG}_P = P\,\mathrm{KG}/(\Delta - P), on the buoyancy basis, are different numbers because they refer to different displacements, as the metacentric heights by lost buoyancy and added weight did in Chapter 12. A metacentric height quoted for a supported ship therefore cannot be interpreted until its basis is stated; the righting moment is unique3.

Two panels in rows, each a schematic section of a box-shaped hull seen from aft, heeled 20 degrees to starboard about its keel K, which rests on a block, with the water level horizontal and the heights of the points not to scale; port is on the left and starboard on the right. An orange arrow P points up at K. (a) On the tilted centreline, from the keel upwards, lie G (black), M prime (orange) and M1 (blue). An orange arrow points up from M prime, labelled delta, and a black arrow points down from G, labelled delta; a dimension between the verticals through G and M prime is labelled GM e sin phi. A note reads: M prime, where delta minus P and P combine into delta. Text at the upper right reads: righting moment delta times GM e sin phi, GM e equals GM1 minus P KM1 over delta. (b) On the tilted centreline lie G (black), G P (orange) above it and M1 (blue) above that. A blue arrow points up from M1, labelled delta minus P, and an orange arrow points down from G P, labelled delta minus P; a dimension between the verticals through G P and M1 is labelled G P M1 sin phi. A note reads: G P, where delta and P combine into delta minus P. Text at the upper right reads: righting moment (delta minus P) times G P M1 sin phi, KG P equals KG delta over (delta minus P).

Figure 13.2 The two pairings of the three forces on a section heeled about its keel, heights not to scale: (a) on the weight basis, P and Δ−P\Delta - P replaced by Δ through M′; (b) on the buoyancy basis, Δ and P replaced by Δ−P\Delta - P through GP\mathrm{G}_P.

Free surfaces in the ship’s tanks reduce the righting moment on either basis. The free surface moment FSM, a moment of mass in t·m, takes gFSMg\,\mathrm{FSM}, in kN·m, off the bracket of Eq. (13.3). The correction is FSM/Δm\mathrm{FSM}/\Delta_m on GMe\mathrm{GM}_e and FSM/(Δm−Pm)\mathrm{FSM}/(\Delta_m - P_m) on GPM1\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1, and KG in the three forms may be replaced by the fluid KGf\mathrm{KG}_f of Chapter 5.

13.2.2 The metacentre of the supported waterline

The metacentre M1\mathrm{M}_1 in the three forms of the righting moment is that of the waterline at which the supported ship actually floats. That waterline lies lower than the ship’s free waterline and, for a ship that bears on a line of keel blocks, parallel to the blocks4. Its KM differs from the KM afloat, since KM changes with the draught. On a box of breadth BB and draught TT, KM=T/2+B2/(12T)\mathrm{KM} = T/2 + B^2/(12\,T) rises as the draught falls whenever TT is less than B/6B/\sqrt{6}, and on the Series 60 hull at light draughts KM rises steeply, from 7.657 m at a draught of 3.0 m to 9.641 m at 2.0 m (Table 7.2). Taking KM at the free waterline would understate the stability that the supported ship has.

13.2.3 A support above the keel

A launching cradle, or a docking cradle shaped to the hull, bears on the ship above its keel. Suppose that the support acts at a point C of the centreline, a height zCz_C above K, that it stays at that point of the ship as the ship heels, and that it gives no moment of its own. Its upward force has the lever zCsinφz_C\sin\varphi about K, on the side of the buoyancy, and Eq. (13.3) becomes

MR=(Δ1KM1+PzC−ΔKG)sinφ,GMe=GM1−P(KM1−zC)Δ.(13.6)M_R = \left(\Delta_1\,\mathrm{KM}_1 + P\,z_C - \Delta\,\mathrm{KG}\right)\sin\varphi , \qquad \mathrm{GM}_e = \mathrm{GM}_1 - \frac{P\,(\mathrm{KM}_1 - z_C)}{\Delta} . \qquad (13.6)

A support at the height of G acts as a weight removed at G and leaves Δ1GM1\Delta_1\,\mathrm{GM}_1 as the righting-moment coefficient, and a support at M1\mathrm{M}_1 costs no stability. A support at the keel is therefore the least favourable position among such supports at or above K. Treating a cradle as a vertical support at K is conservative within this model; the actual contact and restraints must still be assessed. A support that spreads across the bottom, such as a flat bank or a pair of launching ways, behaves differently, because as the ship heels its reaction moves out towards the side that goes down and resists the heel.

13.2.4 Stability on the keel line and the critical draught

Suppose now that the ship rests on its keel along its whole length, as on the line of keel blocks in a dock or on a long narrow shoal, and that the water falls. The ship can heel about K but cannot trim, and its draught TT is fixed by the water level. Its buoyancy is that of the hull at the draught TT on even keel, Δ(T)\Delta(T), and the support force P=Δ−Δ(T)P = \Delta - \Delta(T) grows as the water falls. By Eq. (13.3) the ship stays upright while Δ(T)KM(T)>ΔKG\Delta(T)\,\mathrm{KM}(T) > \Delta\,\mathrm{KG}, and it becomes unstable at the critical draught TcT_c, where

Δ(Tc)KM(Tc)=ΔKG.(13.7)\Delta(T_c)\,\mathrm{KM}(T_c) = \Delta\,\mathrm{KG} . \qquad (13.7)

Below that draught the ship heels over unless shores, props set against its sides, or bilge blocks hold it5. The critical draught is found by plotting both sides of Eq. (13.7) against the draught and reading where they cross5. A master whose ship has grounded along its keel on a falling tide needs the critical draught to know how much time remains5.

For a box barge of length LL and breadth BB that floats freely at T0T_0, Δ(T)=ρgLBT\Delta(T) = \rho\,g\,L\,B\,T and KM(T)=T/2+B2/(12T)\mathrm{KM}(T) = T/2 + B^2/(12\,T). Equation (13.7) becomes Tc2/2+B2/12=T0KGT_c^2/2 + B^2/12 = T_0\,\mathrm{KG}, which gives

Tc=2T0KG−B26.(13.8)T_c = \sqrt{2\,T_0\,\mathrm{KG} - \frac{B^2}{6}} . \qquad (13.8)

Whenever the barge is stable afloat, TcT_c lies below T0T_0. If 2T0KG2\,T_0\,\mathrm{KG} is less than B2/6B^2/6, the square root has no real value, and the barge remains stable on its keel line down to the smallest draught.

In Fig. 13.3 both sides of Eq. (13.7) are plotted against the draught for a box barge 54 m long and 11 m wide that floats freely at 3.20 m with KG = 4.20 m. As the water falls, the moment of the buoyancy about K, Δ(T)KM(T)\Delta(T)\,\mathrm{KM}(T), falls towards the moment of the weight, ΔKG\Delta\,\mathrm{KG}, which does not change. The gap between the two at any draught is the righting-moment coefficient of the barge on its keel line, and it closes at the critical draught, 2.591 m, the value that Eq. (13.8) gives.

A graph of the moment about K per radian of heel, in thousands of kilonewton-metres, from 68 to 96, against the draught on the keel line, from 1.8 to 3.4 m, for a box barge 54 m long and 11 m wide floating freely at 3.20 m with KG of 4.20 m. A blue curve labelled buoyancy, delta of T times KM of T, rises from about 70 at 1.8 m to about 95 at 3.4 m. A dashed black horizontal line is labelled weight, delta times KG, equals 80.3. The curve crosses the line at a black dot, labelled critical draught, T c equals 2.591 m; to the left of it, below the line, a label reads unstable on the keel line. At 2.80 m an orange double-headed arrow spans the gap between the line and the curve, labelled righting-moment coefficient at 2.80 m, 3365 kN·m. A dotted vertical line at 3.20 m is labelled afloat, T 0 equals 3.20 m.

Figure 13.3 The critical draught of a box barge on its keel line, from both sides of Eq. (13.7). The barge is 54 m × 11 m and floats freely at 3.20 m with KG = 4.20 m.

Example 13.1. A box barge on keel blocks. A box barge 54 m long, 11 m wide and 5.5 m deep floats on even keel in sea water at a draught of 3.20 m, with KG = 4.20 m. It is docked on a line of keel blocks under its centreline and lands on them along its whole length. After it has landed, the water level falls by a further 0.40 m. Find the mass PmP_m carried by the blocks, the metacentric height on the weight basis and on the buoyancy basis, and the righting-moment coefficient, and find the draught at which the barge would become unstable if nothing but the keel blocks held it.

Show full solution

Solution.

Displacement and support. Afloat the barge displaces Δm\Delta_m = 1.025 × 54 × 11 × 3.20 = 1948.32 t. After the fall of 0.40 m it floats at 2.80 m, where the water carries Δm1\Delta_{m1} = 1.025 × 54 × 11 × 2.80 = 1704.78 t, and the blocks carry, by Eq. (13.1),

Pm=1948.32−1704.78=243.54t.P_m = 1948.32 - 1704.78 = 243.54\ \mathrm{t} .

The metacentre at 2.80 m.

KM1=2.802+11212×2.80=1.4000+12133.6=1.4000+3.6012=5.0012m,\mathrm{KM}_1 = \frac{2.80}{2} + \frac{11^2}{12 \times 2.80} = 1.4000 + \frac{121}{33.6} = 1.4000 + 3.6012 = 5.0012\ \mathrm{m} ,

and GM1\mathrm{GM}_1 = 5.0012 − 4.20 = 0.8012 m. Afloat at 3.20 m, KM = 1.60 + 121/38.4 = 4.7510 m and GM = 0.5510 m; KM has risen by 0.25 m with the lower waterline.

Weight basis. By Eq. (13.4),

GMe=0.8012−243.54×5.00121948.32=0.8012−0.6252=0.1760m.\mathrm{GM}_e = 0.8012 - \frac{243.54 \times 5.0012}{1948.32} = 0.8012 - 0.6252 = 0.1760\ \mathrm{m} .

Buoyancy basis. By Eq. (13.5),

KGP=1948.32×4.201704.78=8182.941704.78=4.8000m,GPM1=5.0012−4.8000=0.2012m.\begin{aligned} \mathrm{KG}_P &= \frac{1948.32 \times 4.20}{1704.78} = \frac{8182.94}{1704.78} = 4.8000\ \mathrm{m} , \\ \mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 &= 5.0012 - 4.8000 = 0.2012\ \mathrm{m} . \end{aligned}

Righting-moment coefficient. With KM1\mathrm{KM}_1 carried to one more decimal, the bracket of Eq. (13.3) is

9.81×(1704.78×5.00119−1948.32×4.20)=9.81×(8525.93−8182.94)=9.81×342.99=3365kN⋅m.9.81 \times (1704.78 \times 5.00119 - 1948.32 \times 4.20) = 9.81 \times (8525.93 - 8182.94) = 9.81 \times 342.99 = 3365\ \mathrm{kN \cdot m} .

On the weight basis, 9.81 × 1948.32 × 0.1760 = 3364 kN·m, and on the buoyancy basis, 9.81 × 1704.78 × 0.2012 = 3365 kN·m; the difference of 1 kN·m comes from rounding.

Critical draught. By Eq. (13.8),

Tc=2×3.20×4.20−1216=26.880−20.167=6.713=2.591m.T_c = \sqrt{2 \times 3.20 \times 4.20 - \frac{121}{6}} = \sqrt{26.880 - 20.167} = \sqrt{6.713} = 2.591\ \mathrm{m} .

Comment. The barge was stable afloat with GM = 0.551 m. A fall of 0.40 m has put 12.5 % of its weight on the blocks and left a metacentric height of 0.176 m on the weight basis or 0.201 m on the buoyancy basis, and both give a righting-moment coefficient of 3365 kN·m. A further 0.209 m of fall, to 2.591 m, would reduce it to zero; at that point the blocks would carry 1.025 × 54 × 11 × 0.609 = 370.8 t, or 19 % of the weight.

13.3 Docking in a graving dock

13.3.1 The graving dock

The commonest occasion on which a ship rests on a support at its keel is docking, when it is taken out of the water to have its bottom and its underwater fittings inspected and worked on. A graving dock, or dry dock, is a masonry-lined basin in the ground whose entrance can be closed, by hinged gates or a floating caisson, once the ship is inside, and the water is then pumped out. When the dock is dry the ship sits on a line of keel blocks along its floor and is held upright by breast shores between its sides and the dock walls, with further shores under the turn of the bilge and the overhang of the stern2.

13.3.2 The docking plan

Where the ship is to sit in the dock is settled beforehand. Its docking plan gives the stations at which breast shores can bear on the hull, usually where a transverse bulkhead can take their thrust, and the projections that the blocks and the dock entrance must clear, such as propellers that reach below the line of the keel and the bilge keels2. The plan also records the plugs in the ship’s bottom and tanks and the liquids that the tanks may contain6. The tides, draughts and trims at which the ship can be docked are found by comparing the docking plan with the plans of the dock2.

13.3.3 Landing on the blocks

The ship enters upright, with a positive metacentric height and with as few free surfaces in its tanks as can be arranged3,7. In the conventional sequence described by Kemp and Young, a trim of 0.30 m to 1.00 m by the stern is usual7; the actual docking plan determines the entry trim. It is made a little larger than the slope of the block tops, and the after cut-up, the after end of its keel, touches first2. When the ship’s centreline lies over the line of blocks, the shores are placed loosely, the entrance is closed and pumping begins3. As the water level falls, a force builds up at the after end of the keel and trims the ship by the head until the keel bears on the blocks along its whole length. The shores are hardened from aft forward as the ship settles and are all tight by the time the ship takes the blocks overall3, but they are not relied on to hold the ship while it still turns on the after end of its keel. Once the keel bears overall, pumping is stopped until they have been set up firmly7.

The interval between the landing of the stern and the moment at which the keel bears along its whole length is the critical period, and its last moment, the critical instant, is normally the moment of least stability in this sequence before the shores can act3,4. Stability must nevertheless be checked throughout the operation. Until the critical instant the support is concentrated at the after end of the keel, the shores are not yet relied on, and the stability of the ship is that of Eq. (13.3) with P at K. Once the keel bears on all the blocks, the breast shores hold the ship upright2. The force on the blocks keeps growing as the dock is emptied3; adequately designed and secured side supports must then resist overturning. As can be seen from Fig. 13.4, drawn at true proportions for the Series 60 ship, the trim that the support removes, 2.59 m on a length of 121.92 m, turns the keel through only 1.2°. The after end of the keel, where the support acts while the ship pivots, is enlarged in Fig. 13.4(d).

Four panels in rows. The first three each show the Series 60 ship in profile at true proportions in a graving dock with a row of keel blocks 1.5 m high on its floor and the dock walls at both ends. (a) Entering: the ship is afloat, trimmed 2.59 m by the stern, with its keel sloping down towards the stern and clear of the blocks; the water stands 4.95 m above the blocks. (b) Pivoting on the after block: the after end of the keel rests on the first block, through which an orange arrow P points up; a label inside the hull above the water reads P m equals 145 t; the ship has trimmed a little by the head, and the water stands 3.63 m above the blocks. (c) Critical instant: the keel lies level on all the blocks, the orange arrow P rises through the first block at the after end, a label inside the hull reads P m equals 284 t, and the water stands 2.91 m above the blocks. (d) The stern of panel (b), enlarged five times, at true proportions: the stern contour comes down to the after end of the keel, marked C by a black dot, which rests on the first keel block; an orange arrow P points up through the block to C. Forward of C the keel rises slightly over the next blocks, which it clears by a small gap that widens forward. The water level lies above, and the dock wall is on the left.

Figure 13.4 The Series 60 ship at 3407 t docking on level blocks, at true proportions: (a) entering, afloat, with 4.95 m of water above the blocks; (b) pivoting on the after block, at 3.63 m; (c) the critical instant, at 2.91 m; (d) the stern in (b), enlarged five times. Computed on the Series 60 hull.

13.3.4 The support force from the change of trim

While the ship pivots on the after end of its keel, the support at C trims it by the head, as a weight removed there would, Eq. (6.7). The moment of the support about the centre of flotation equals MCT 1 cm times the trim lost since the ship landed,

Pm(xF−xC)=MCT1cm⋅δt,(13.9)P_m\,(x_F - x_C) = \mathrm{MCT\,1\,cm}\cdot\delta t , \qquad (13.9)

with δt\delta t the trim removed so far, in centimetres, and PmP_m in tonnes3,7. At the critical instant on level blocks, δt\delta t is the whole trim with which the ship entered the dock; on blocks with a slope, it is the entry trim less the slope of the blocks times the length between perpendiculars.

Which MCT 1 cm belongs in Eq. (13.9) follows from the trims of the two ships that the linear method of Chapter 6 compares. Afloat, the ship trims by t0=Δm(xB0−xG)/MCT0t_0 = \Delta_m\,(x_{B0} - x_G)/\mathrm{MCT}_0 centimetres, with xB0x_{B0} and MCT0=ΔmGML/(100L)\mathrm{MCT}_0 = \Delta_m\,\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}/(100\,L) those of its even-keel waterline, Eqs. (6.11) and (4.22). With the support counted as a weight removed at C, the supported ship is a ship of displacement Δ1\Delta_1 with the virtual GP\mathrm{G}_P of Eq. (13.5), and it trims by t1=(Δm1xB1−ΔmxG+PmxC)/MCT1t_1 = (\Delta_{m1}\,x_{B1} - \Delta_m\,x_G + P_m\,x_C)/\mathrm{MCT}_1 centimetres. Here xB1x_{B1} and MCT1=Δm1(KML1−KGP)/(100L)\mathrm{MCT}_1 = \Delta_{m1}\,(\mathrm{KM}_{L1} - \mathrm{KG}_P)/(100\,L) are those of the even-keel waterline of Δ1\Delta_1, and KML1\mathrm{KM}_{L1} is the height of its longitudinal metacentre above K. The difference of the two moments of buoyancy, ΔmxB0−Δm1xB1\Delta_m\,x_{B0} - \Delta_{m1}\,x_{B1}, is the moment of the layer of water between the two waterlines, PmxFP_m\,x_F, with xFx_F the centre of flotation of that layer, and subtracting the two trims gives

Pm(xF−xC)=t0MCT0−t1MCT1.P_m\,(x_F - x_C) = t_0\,\mathrm{MCT}_0 - t_1\,\mathrm{MCT}_1 .

At the critical instant on level blocks t1t_1 = 0, and Eq. (13.9) takes MCT0\mathrm{MCT}_0: the MCT 1 cm of the ship afloat at entry, built with its own longitudinal metacentric height and its real G, together with the xFx_F of the layer between the waterline on entry and that of the critical instant. Hydrostatic tables, Table 6.1 among them, give MCT 1 cm with BML\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L} in place of GML\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}, Eq. (4.23); the value with GML\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L} is smaller by Δm(KG−KB)/(100L)\Delta_m\,(\mathrm{KG} - \mathrm{KB})/(100\,L), 2 % for the Series 60 ship, and the table’s value gives a larger P. The MCT 1 cm of the supported ship at the waterline of the moment, MCT1\mathrm{MCT}_1, is smaller still, and it governs not the force but its growth: with a trim t1t_1 still to lose, a further centimetre of trim removed adds MCT1/(xF−xC)\mathrm{MCT}_1/(x_F - x_C) to PmP_m. The waterline of the critical instant, and with it xFx_F and the KM1\mathrm{KM}_1 of the stability, depend on P itself. In practice P is first estimated with the values of the hydrostatic table at the mean draught on entry and then recomputed with those at the draught that this estimate gives2.

Equation (13.9) is linear, with the stiffness of the ship in trim taken at a single waterline. On the way down onto the blocks, however, the ship passes through a range of trimmed waterlines, and with the large trims that light ships sometimes bring into a dock the linear estimate loses accuracy. The exact force at the critical instant follows from the moments about the after end of the keel, Eq. (13.2). On level blocks the waterline at the critical instant is parallel to the keel, and the displacement and the centre of buoyancy of that waterline can be read from the ordinary hydrostatic table; the draught T1T_1 is the draught at which the moment of buoyancy about C equals the moment of the weight about C. Where the blocks have a slope, the balance is made with waterlines parallel to them4.

13.3.5 The Series 60 ship at the critical instant

In Chapter 6 the Series 60 ship discharged all 4300 t of cargo from its departure condition, leaving 3407 t with a trim of 2.59 m by the stern. A ship would not normally bring so large a trim into a dock, and docking it in this light condition shows the limits of the linear method of Sec. 13.3.4. The hydrostatic values of its hull at the light draughts through which it passes in the dock are listed in Table 13.1.

Table 13.1 Hydrostatic values of the Series 60 hull at light draughts, upright and on even keel in sea water (ρ = 1.025 t/m³). xBx_B and xFx_F are measured forward of the AP. MCT 1 cm is ρIL/(100L)\rho I_L/(100\,L), with BML\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L} in place of GML\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}, as in Table 6.1.

TT (m) Δm\Delta_m (t) TPC (t/cm) xBx_B (m) xFx_F (m) MCT 1 cm (t·m/cm) KM (m)
2.2 2255.7 11.95 60.050 60.25 58.99 9.087
2.3 2375.6 12.03 60.060 60.23 59.56 8.849
2.4 2496.2 12.10 60.068 60.21 60.10 8.632
2.5 2617.6 12.17 60.074 60.18 60.63 8.434
2.6 2739.6 12.23 60.078 60.15 61.14 8.252
2.7 2862.2 12.29 60.080 60.12 61.64 8.085
2.8 2985.5 12.35 60.082 60.09 62.13 7.932
2.9 3109.3 12.41 60.081 60.05 62.61 7.789
3.0 3233.7 12.46 60.079 60.01 63.08 7.657
3.1 3358.6 12.52 60.076 59.97 63.55 7.534
3.2 3484.0 12.57 60.071 59.91 64.03 7.420

Example 13.2. Docking the Series 60 ship. The Series 60 ship displaces 3407 t, with xGx_G = 55.270 m and KG = 6.123 m, and has no free surfaces in its tanks. It floats in sea water at TAT_A = 4.399 m and TFT_F = 1.812 m and is to be docked on level keel blocks. The after end of its keel, which lands first, lies at xCx_C = 2.337 m forward of the AP. Using Table 13.1, find (a) the waterline and the mass PmP_m on the blocks at the critical instant from the moments about the after end of the keel, (b) PmP_m from the change of trim, Eq. (13.9), with MCT 1 cm as Table 13.1 gives it, and (c) the metacentric height on both bases and the righting-moment coefficient at the critical instant.

Show full solution

Solution.

(a) Moments about the after end of the keel. As moments of mass, in t·m, the weight has the moment

Δm(xG−xC)=3407×(55.270−2.337)=3407×52.933=180,342.7t⋅m\Delta_m\,(x_G - x_C) = 3407 \times (55.270 - 2.337) = 3407 \times 52.933 = 180{,}342.7\ \mathrm{t \cdot m}

about C. At the critical instant the keel lies on the blocks and the waterline is level. From Table 13.1, the buoyancy has the moment 3109.3 × (60.081 − 2.337) = 179,543.4 t·m about C at 2.9 m and 3233.7 × (60.079 − 2.337) = 186,720.3 t·m at 3.0 m. Interpolating,

T1=2.9+0.1×180,342.7−179,543.4186,720.3−179,543.4=2.9+0.1×0.1114=2.911m,T_1 = 2.9 + 0.1 \times \frac{180{,}342.7 - 179{,}543.4}{186{,}720.3 - 179{,}543.4} = 2.9 + 0.1 \times 0.1114 = 2.911\ \mathrm{m} ,

where the water carries Δm1\Delta_{m1} = 3109.3 + 0.1114 × 124.4 = 3123.2 t, and by Eq. (13.1) the blocks carry

Pm=3407−3123.2=283.8t.P_m = 3407 - 3123.2 = 283.8\ \mathrm{t} .

(b) From the change of trim. The ship has to lose its whole trim, tt = 4.399 − 1.812 = 2.587 m. At its mean draught on entry, (4.399 + 1.812)/2 = 3.1055 m, Table 13.1 gives MCT 1 cm = 63.58 t·m/cm and xFx_F = 59.97 m, and by Eq. (13.9)

Pm=63.58×258.759.97−2.337=16,448.157.633=285.4t.P_m = \frac{63.58 \times 258.7}{59.97 - 2.337} = \frac{16{,}448.1}{57.633} = 285.4\ \mathrm{t} .

This leaves 3121.6 t to the water, a draught of 2.910 m, where MCT 1 cm = 62.66 t·m/cm and xFx_F = 60.05 m, and the second estimate is

Pm=62.66×258.760.05−2.337=16,210.157.713=280.9t.P_m = \frac{62.66 \times 258.7}{60.05 - 2.337} = \frac{16{,}210.1}{57.713} = 280.9\ \mathrm{t} .

(c) Stability at the critical instant. At 2.911 m, KM1\mathrm{KM}_1 = 7.789 − 0.1114 × 0.132 = 7.7743 m, and GM1\mathrm{GM}_1 = 7.7743 − 6.123 = 1.6513 m. On the weight basis, Eq. (13.4),

GMe=1.6513−283.8×7.77433407=1.6513−0.6476=1.0037m.\mathrm{GM}_e = 1.6513 - \frac{283.8 \times 7.7743}{3407} = 1.6513 - 0.6476 = 1.0037\ \mathrm{m} .

On the buoyancy basis, Eq. (13.5),

KGP=3407×6.1233123.2=20,861.13123.2=6.6794m,GPM1=7.7743−6.6794=1.0949m.\mathrm{KG}_P = \frac{3407 \times 6.123}{3123.2} = \frac{20{,}861.1}{3123.2} = 6.6794\ \mathrm{m} , \qquad \mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 = 7.7743 - 6.6794 = 1.0949\ \mathrm{m} .

The righting-moment coefficient is 9.81 × 3407 × 1.0037 = 33,546 kN·m, or 9.81 × 3123.2 × 1.0949 = 33,546 kN·m.

Comment. The second estimate by Eq. (13.9) lies 1.0 % below the force from the moments. The MCT 1 cm that belongs in Eq. (13.9) is that of the ship afloat at entry, with its real G. On even keel at 3407 t the ship would float at 3.139 m, where Table 13.1 gives MCT 1 cm = 63.74 t·m/cm with BML\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L}; with KB = 1.687 m the value with GML\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L} is 63.74 − 3407 × (6.123 − 1.687)/12,192 = 63.74 − 1.24 = 62.50 t·m/cm. With xFx_F = 60.00 m, the centre of flotation of the layer between 3.139 m and 2.911 m, the estimate is 62.50 × 258.7/(60.00 − 2.337) = 280.4 t, 1.2 % below the force from the moments. The table’s value at 2.910 m, 62.66 t·m/cm, lies close to 62.50 t·m/cm, which is why the second estimate above does as well. The 1.2 % that remains is the price of a linear method at a trim of 2.6 m: on the way down the ship passes through trimmed waterplanes whose MCT is larger and whose F lies further aft than on the level waterlines, and on the hull itself PmP_m grows by 113 t for each metre of trim removed just after it lands and by 107 t just before the critical instant. That rate follows the MCT 1 cm of the supported ship at the waterline of the moment, Sec. 13.3.4, which at the critical instant, with KB1\mathrm{KB}_1 = 1.566 m, is 62.66 − (20,861.1 − 3123.2 × 1.566)/12,192 = 61.35 t·m/cm and with the lever 57.713 m gives 106 t for each metre of trim.

The critical instant computed on the hull comes at 2.912 m, with 283.8 t on the blocks. Afloat at entry the ship had GM = 1.50 m, and at the critical instant it has GMe\mathrm{GM}_e = 1.00 m. The support has reduced the ship’s metacentric height by 0.65 m on the weight basis, and the higher KM of the lower waterline has restored 0.15 m. With the free surface moments that the IS Code assumes for its consumable liquids, 1573.5 t·m with the two small tanks left out (Chapters 5 and 11), the coefficient would have been 33,546 − 9.81 × 1573.5 = 33,546 − 15,436 = 18,110 kN·m, and GMe\mathrm{GM}_e 0.542 m.

13.3.6 The largest trim for a required metacentric height

The force at the critical instant grows with the trim that the ship brings into the dock, Eq. (13.9), and docking trims are kept small for this reason. If a metacentric height of at least GMr\mathrm{GM}_r is required at the critical instant, the support force may not exceed, by Eqs. (13.4) and (13.5),

Pmax=Δ(GM1−GMr)KM1(weight basis),Pmax=Δ(GM1−GMr)KM1−GMr(buoyancy basis),(13.10)P_{\max} = \frac{\Delta\,(\mathrm{GM}_1 - \mathrm{GM}_r)}{\mathrm{KM}_1} \ \text{(weight basis)} , \qquad P_{\max} = \frac{\Delta\,(\mathrm{GM}_1 - \mathrm{GM}_r)}{\mathrm{KM}_1 - \mathrm{GM}_r} \ \text{(buoyancy basis)} , \qquad (13.10)

and the largest trim follows from Eq. (13.9) with PmaxP_{\max}. The two limits of Eq. (13.10) answer two different requirements, because a metacentric height on the buoyancy basis multiplies a smaller displacement. A requirement of this sort has to state its basis. KM1\mathrm{KM}_1 and xFx_F belong to the waterline of the critical instant, which depends on PmaxP_{\max}, and MCT 1 cm to the ship afloat at entry. For a ship this needs a short iteration; for a box barge that waterline follows directly from PmaxP_{\max}.

Example 13.3. The largest docking trim of a box barge. The box barge of Example 13.1, 54 m × 11 m × 5.5 m, has a displacement of 1948.32 t, that of a draught of 3.20 m on even keel, and KG = 4.20 m. Its G lies on the centreline but aft of mid-length, and it floats trimmed by the stern. It is to be docked on level keel blocks under its centreline, landing first at its after end. Find the largest trim at which it may enter the dock if the effective metacentric height at the critical instant is to be at least 0.45 m on the weight basis, and the largest trim if GPM1\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 is to be at least 0.45 m instead.

Show full solution

Solution.

The critical instant of a box. At the critical instant the barge lies level on its keel and the water carries a fraction r=Δ1/Δr = \Delta_1/\Delta of its weight, at the draught rT0r T_0 with T0T_0 = 3.20 m. Its buoyancy then acts at mid-length, 27 m from the after end, and Eq. (13.2) about the after end gives r×27=xGr \times 27 = x_G; by Eq. (13.1), P=(1−r)ΔP = (1 - r)\,\Delta.

Weight basis. With KM1=rT0/2+B2/(12rT0)\mathrm{KM}_1 = r T_0/2 + B^2/(12\,r T_0), Eq. (13.4) gives GMe=rKM1−KG=r2T0/2+B2/(12T0)−KG\mathrm{GM}_e = r\,\mathrm{KM}_1 - \mathrm{KG} = r^2 T_0/2 + B^2/(12\,T_0) - \mathrm{KG}. Setting it to 0.45 m,

r2=2(0.45+4.20−3.15104)3.20=2×1.498963.20=0.93685,r=0.96791,r^2 = \frac{2\,(0.45 + 4.20 - 3.15104)}{3.20} = \frac{2 \times 1.49896}{3.20} = 0.93685 , \qquad r = 0.96791 ,

and PmP_m = (1 − 0.96791) × 1948.32 = 0.03209 × 1948.32 = 62.52 t, with xGx_G = 0.96791 × 27 = 26.134 m.

The trim. The MCT 1 cm in Eq. (13.9) is that of the barge afloat at entry, built with its own longitudinal metacentric height. Afloat, with KB = 1.600 m and BML\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L} = 54²/(12 × 3.20) = 75.9375 m, the barge has GML\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L} = 1.600 + 75.9375 − 4.200 = 73.3375 m and

MCT1cm=ΔmGML100L=1948.32×73.3375100×54=142,8855400=26.460t⋅m/cm.\mathrm{MCT\,1\,cm} = \frac{\Delta_m\,\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}}{100\,L} = \frac{1948.32 \times 73.3375}{100 \times 54} = \frac{142{,}885}{5400} = 26.460\ \mathrm{t \cdot m/cm} .

The lever of the support about F is 27 m, and by Eq. (13.9)

t=62.52×27100×26.460=1688.02646.0=0.64mt = \frac{62.52 \times 27}{100 \times 26.460} = \frac{1688.0}{2646.0} = 0.64\ \mathrm{m}

by the stern.

Buoyancy basis. GPM1=KM1−KG/r≥0.45\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 = \mathrm{KM}_1 - \mathrm{KG}/r \geq 0.45 gives, multiplied by rr, 1.60r2−0.45r+3.15104−4.20=01.60\,r^2 - 0.45\,r + 3.15104 - 4.20 = 0, and

r=0.45+0.452+4×1.60×1.048962×1.60=0.45+2.62983.20=0.96244.r = \frac{0.45 + \sqrt{0.45^2 + 4 \times 1.60 \times 1.04896}}{2 \times 1.60} = \frac{0.45 + 2.6298}{3.20} = 0.96244 .

PmP_m = 0.03756 × 1948.32 = 73.18 t, and with the MCT 1 cm of the barge afloat the trim is 73.18 × 27/2646.0 = 1975.9/2646.0 = 0.75 m.

Comment. The requirement on the weight basis allows 0.64 m of trim and the requirement on the buoyancy basis 0.75 m. At 0.75 m, which meets the requirement on the buoyancy basis, the effective metacentric height on the weight basis is 0.433 m, short of 0.45 m. Both trims lie in the range of 0.30 m to 1.00 m quoted by Kemp and Young for the conventional docking sequence (Sec. 13.3.3).

13.3.7 After the keel takes the blocks

Once the keel bears on all the blocks, the ship can no longer trim, and every centimetre of fall of the water puts about TPC tonnes more on the blocks. More exactly, the support force at any draught is the weight of the ship less the weight of water it displaces at that draught on even keel3,7, and as a mass

Pm=Δm−Δm(T)≈Pm,c+100TPC⋅h,(13.11)P_m = \Delta_m - \Delta_m(T) \approx P_{m,c} + 100\,\mathrm{TPC}\cdot h , \qquad (13.11)

where hh is the fall in metres since the keel first bore along its length, Pm,cP_{m,c} is the mass already carried by the blocks at that critical instant, and TPC is held at its mean value over the fall. At zero further fall the load is therefore Pm,cP_{m,c}. Equation (13.7) then applies, and if the keel blocks were the only support, the upright ship would lose stability at the critical draught. The breast shores, set tight once the keel bears overall7, and the bilge blocks must be adequate to hold it. A docking calculation therefore covers both the critical instant and the critical draught. In the damage control training of the United States Navy, the pumping out of a dock is stopped just before the critical draught is reached, to check that the side blocks are supporting the ship8.

For the Series 60 ship of Example 13.2, ΔmKG\Delta_m\,\mathrm{KG} = 3407 × 6.123 = 20,861.1 t·m. From Table 13.1, ΔmKM\Delta_m\,\mathrm{KM} is 2255.7 × 9.087 = 20,497.5 t·m at 2.2 m and 2375.6 × 8.849 = 21,021.7 t·m at 2.3 m, and the critical draught on the keel line is TcT_c = 2.2 + 0.1 × 363.6/524.2 = 2.269 m, where the blocks would carry 3407 − 2338.9 = 1068.1 t. Between the critical instant at 2.911 m and the critical draught lies a fall of 0.642 m, during which the shores must be secured. With the free surface moments that the IS Code assumes for the consumable liquids, 1573.5 t·m with the two small tanks left out (Chapters 5 and 11), ΔmKGf\Delta_m\,\mathrm{KG}_f = 22,434.6 t·m and the critical draught rises to 2.567 m, 0.344 m below the critical instant.

Two panels in rows against the fall of the water in the dock since the stern touched the blocks, from 0 to 2.35 m. (a) The mass P m carried by the blocks, in tonnes: a straight line rises slowly from zero to 284 t at a fall of 1.44 m, marked as the critical instant by a dashed vertical line, and then rises steeply, to 1200 t at a fall of about 2.19 m. Labels read: the stern on the after block, the ship trimming, to the left of the critical instant; the keel on all the blocks, to the right. (b) The righting-moment coefficient, with the keel blocks as the only support, in thousands of kilonewton-metres: a solid line for the ship with no free surfaces falls slowly from about 50 at no fall to 33.6 at the critical instant and then falls steeply, crossing zero at a fall of 2.08 m, marked by a filled triangle and labelled critical draught on the keel line, 2.269 m above the blocks. A dashed line for the ship with free surface moments of 1573.5 t·m lies 15.4 lower throughout and crosses zero at 1.78 m, marked by an open triangle and labelled with the free surfaces, 2.568 m above the blocks.

Figure 13.5 The Series 60 ship of Example 13.2 docking on level blocks, against the fall of the water since the stern touched: (a) the mass on the blocks, PmP_m; (b) the righting-moment coefficient, with the keel blocks as the only support. Computed on the Series 60 hull.

In Fig. 13.5 the mass on the blocks grows slowly while the ship pivots on its stern, by about 2 t for each centimetre of fall, and then by about 12 t a centimetre once the keel bears along its length. The righting-moment coefficient falls with it, slowly at first and steeply after the critical instant, and with the keel blocks as the only support it would reach zero at the critical draught. The force at the critical instant is small, and the danger of that stage seems to come from the lack of shores during the critical period.

Load on the blocks. When the dock is dry, the whole weight rests on the blocks. Let the keel blocks be spaced evenly along a length LkL_k with their middle at xmx_m. If the hull is rigid and the blocks are equally compressible, the load varies linearly along the line, and it must balance the weight and its moment about the middle of the line. The load per metre, as a mass in t/m, is then

w(x)=ΔmLk[1+12e(x−xm)Lk2],e=xG−xm,(13.12)w(x) = \frac{\Delta_m}{L_k}\left[1 + \frac{12\,e\,(x - x_m)}{L_k^2}\right] , \qquad e = x_G - x_m , \qquad (13.12)

and at the two ends it is (Δm/Lk)(1±6e/Lk)(\Delta_m/L_k)(1 \pm 6e/L_k). All the blocks stay loaded only while |e||e| does not exceed Lk/6L_k/6, the middle-third rule of a footing. Let the Series 60 ship rest on blocks from the after end of its keel, 2.337 m forward of the AP, to 120.0 m, just aft of the point where its forefoot meets the baseline. Then LkL_k = 117.663 m, xmx_m = 61.168 m and ee = 55.270 − 61.168 = −5.898 m. With 6e/Lk6e/L_k = −0.30076 the mean load of 3407/117.663 = 28.956 t/m rises to 28.956 × 1.30076 = 37.66 t/m at the after end and falls to 28.956 × 0.69924 = 20.25 t/m at the forward end. In the Surface Forces Logistics Center Standard Specification 8634, Dry Docking, under which the United States Coast Guard docks its cutters, the keel block load is also found as a trapezoid, from the displacement, the supported length of keel and the distance of G from its middle9.

13.3.8 Undocking

Before the dock is flooded again, every bottom plug is replaced, and the tanks are sounded again to confirm that the weights on board are distributed as they were when the ship took the blocks and the first soundings were made7. Weights added, removed or shifted while the ship is in the dock change the support force and the trim at which it lifts off, and they enter the calculation for undocking as they would enter any loading condition.

When the dock is flooded, the sequence of docking runs in reverse. The rising water first takes weight off the blocks along the whole keel. Once the moment of the buoyancy about the after end of the keel exceeds that of the weight, the keel begins to leave the forward blocks while its after end still bears. That instant is again critical7, since the force on the after end of the keel is then the largest of the stage in which the ship pivots. As the water rises further, the force falls and the righting moment grows until the ship floats. For the Series 60 ship of Example 13.2 the righting-moment coefficient, computed on the hull, grows from 33,558 kN·m at that instant (33,546 kN·m by the interpolation of Table 13.1 in the example) to 50,243 kN·m afloat, and the rise can be followed in Fig. 13.5(b) from right to left.

13.3.9 Docking calculator (Calculator 13.1)

With Calculator 13.1 you can follow a box barge or a ship through the critical instant on level blocks. For a box barge you give its length, breadth and depth, the draught that its displacement would have on even keel, KG, any free surface moments and the position of G along it. The calculator finds the trim afloat and the mass PmP_m on the blocks at the critical instant from the moments about the end that lands first, and beside it PmP_m from the change of trim. It then gives the metacentric height on both bases and the righting moment, and follows the barge down a further fall of the water to its critical draught on the keel line. For a ship you give its displacement and KG, the trim to be removed, the distance of the after end of its keel aft of F, MCT 1 cm afloat at entry and KM at the waterline of the critical instant; the calculator finds PmP_m from the change of trim and the stability of the ship on both bases, with these values held constant. It refuses a barge whose end would come out of the water or whose deck would go under, and a case in which the blocks would carry nearly all the weight. Choose Example 13.1, Example 13.3 or an exercise to see the working, or enter your own barge or ship with realistic values.

13.4 Floating docks and ship lifts

13.4.1 The floating dock

A ship can also be lifted out of the water by a dock that floats. A floating dock is a U-shaped box, a pontoon with a wall on each side, a large part of it divided into ballast tanks. The tanks are flooded to sink the dock, and the ship is brought in over the blocks. The dock and the ship are raised together by pumping out the tanks in a sequence that limits the bending of the dock, and with it of the ship2. Floating docks range from small docks that lift less than 500 t to docks that lift ships of up to 100,000 t. A floating dock can be taken to a port that has no graving dock, provided it is kept seaworthy on the passage, and it can be heeled and trimmed to suit the condition of a damaged ship and support the ship partly while its damage is assessed2.

The ship in a floating dock passes through the critical instant and the critical draught of Sec. 13.3 as the dock rises under the ship, and the props or side blocks must be in place before its critical draught is reached5. The stability of the dock itself is high at its operating freeboard, with the pontoon deck above the water, since its waterplane is then that of the whole pontoon. As the dock rises with a ship on its blocks, however, there is a stage at which the water stands between the pontoon deck and the tops of the blocks. The ship is out of the water and the pontoon below the surface, and the waterplane consists only of the two walls, while the weight of the ship stands high on the blocks. This is usually the stage of least transverse stability; a metacentric height of 1.0 m to 1.5 m is commonly accepted for it, and some operators ask for twice as much in the practice described by Tupper2. For comparison, the 2022 rules of the American Bureau of Shipping for steel floating docks ask for the stability of a dock to be calculated with the tops of the keel blocks breaking water and with the top of the pontoon at the water level, and for a metacentric height of the dock and the ship together, after correction for free surfaces, of at least 1.525 m for docks of up to 10,200 t lifting capacity10.

Example 13.4. A floating dock lifting a barge. A floating dock 70 m long and 19 m wide consists of a pontoon 3.0 m deep and two wing walls, each 2.2 m wide, which run the whole length of the dock and rise to 10 m above its bottom. The dock’s lightweight is 1600 t with its centre of gravity 3.40 m above its bottom. It lifts a box barge 54 m long and 11 m wide, of 1948.32 t with KG = 4.20 m above its keel, which rests on keel blocks 1.4 m high and is held by side blocks, and dock and barge move together. The ballast that remains in the dock at each stage lies in full compartments of the pontoon with its centre at mid-depth, 1.50 m above the bottom, and there are no free surfaces. Find the metacentric height of the dock and the barge together in sea water when the water stands (a) at the tops of the keel blocks, (b) at the pontoon deck, before the deck comes out of the water, and (c) 0.30 m below the pontoon deck. All heights are measured from the bottom of the dock.

Show full solution

Solution.

(a) Water at the tops of the blocks, 4.40 m. The dock displaces the pontoon and the walls up to 4.40 m,

∇=70×19×3.0+2×70×2.2×1.40=3990.0+431.2=4421.2m3,\nabla = 70 \times 19 \times 3.0 + 2 \times 70 \times 2.2 \times 1.40 = 3990.0 + 431.2 = 4421.2\ \mathrm{m}^3 ,

or 1.025 × 4421.2 = 4531.73 t, and the ballast left is 4531.73 − 1600 − 1948.32 = 983.41 t. The centre of buoyancy lies at KB = (3990.0 × 1.50 + 431.2 × 3.70)/4421.2 = 7580.44/4421.2 = 1.7146 m. The waterplane consists of the two walls, each with its centroid 9.5 − 1.1 = 8.40 m from the centreline, and

I=2(70×2.2312+70×2.2×8.402)=2(62.11+10,866.24)=21,856.7m4,I = 2\left(\frac{70 \times 2.2^3}{12} + 70 \times 2.2 \times 8.40^2\right) = 2\,(62.11 + 10{,}866.24) = 21{,}856.7\ \mathrm{m}^4 ,

and BM = 21,856.7/4421.2 = 4.9436 m. The barge’s G lies 4.40 + 4.20 = 8.60 m above the bottom of the dock, and

KG=1600×3.40+1948.32×8.60+983.41×1.504531.73=5440.00+16,755.55+1475.124531.73=5.2233m,\mathrm{KG} = \frac{1600 \times 3.40 + 1948.32 \times 8.60 + 983.41 \times 1.50}{4531.73} = \frac{5440.00 + 16{,}755.55 + 1475.12}{4531.73} = 5.2233\ \mathrm{m} ,

which gives GM = 1.7146 + 4.9436 − 5.2233 = 1.435 m.

(b) Water at the pontoon deck, 3.00 m. ∇ = 3990.0 m³, or 4089.75 t, leaving 541.43 t of ballast; KB = 1.50 m, the waterplane is still that of the walls, BM = 21,856.7/3990.0 = 5.4779 m, and

KG=5440.00+16,755.55+541.43×1.504089.75=23,007.704089.75=5.6257m,\mathrm{KG} = \frac{5440.00 + 16{,}755.55 + 541.43 \times 1.50}{4089.75} = \frac{23{,}007.70}{4089.75} = 5.6257\ \mathrm{m} ,

which gives GM = 1.50 + 5.4779 − 5.6257 = 1.352 m.

(c) Water 0.30 m below the pontoon deck, 2.70 m. ∇ = 70 × 19 × 2.70 = 3591.0 m³, or 3680.78 t, leaving 132.46 t of ballast; KB = 1.35 m, and the waterplane is now that of the whole pontoon, II = 70 × 19³/12 = 40,010.8 m⁴, and BM = 40,010.8/3591.0 = 11.142 m. KG = (22,195.55 + 132.46 × 1.50)/3680.78 = 22,394.24/3680.78 = 6.084 m, and GM = 1.35 + 11.142 − 6.084 = 6.408 m.

Comment. In Fig. 13.6(b) the metacentric height falls as the dock rises from the stage at which the blocks break water to the stage at which its pontoon deck reaches the water. Pumping out the ballast, which lay low in the pontoon, raises G by 0.402 m, while the smaller volume raises BM by 0.534 m and lowers B by 0.215 m. The metacentric height reaches its least value, 1.352 m, with the pontoon deck at the water, and rises to more than 6 m as soon as the deck comes out and the whole pontoon forms the waterplane. The least value lies below the 1.525 m that the rules of the American Bureau of Shipping ask for. Changes to the dock geometry or to the distribution of weight could remove this shortfall, but each such arrangement needs the whole lifting sequence checked again.

Two panels in rows. (a) A section of the floating dock and the barge at true scale: a pontoon 19 m wide and 3.0 m deep, labelled pontoon, 3.0 m deep, 19 m wide, with a wing wall 2.2 m wide on each side rising to 10 m, labelled on the left wing wall, 2.2 m wide. A keel block 1.4 m high stands on the pontoon deck, labelled keel blocks, 1.4 m, and the barge, 11 m wide, rests on it, labelled barge, 54 m by 11 m, with its G marked. Three dashed horizontal lines are lettered on the right: A at 7.6 m, where the barge lands on the blocks; B at 4.4 m, the tops of the blocks; C at 3.0 m, the pontoon deck. At each level thick orange bars mark the waterplane: at A the two walls and the barge; at B and at C the two walls only. (b) A graph of the water level above the dock bottom, from 2.0 to 7.9 m, against the metacentric height of the dock and the barge together, from 0 to 7 m, with the levels A, B and C as dashed horizontal lines. The curve begins at 2.60 m with a GM of 6.60 m, marked by a dot and labelled ballast tanks empty, and falls to about 5.9 m just below C. Between C and B it lies near 1.35 to 1.43 m, to the left of a dotted vertical line at 1.525 m labelled ABS rules, 1.525 m; a label points to its lowest point, at level C: least GM, 1.35 m, with the pontoon deck at the water. Above B the curve jumps to about 2.8 m and rises to about 3.5 m at A, where it ends at a dot labelled the barge lands.

Figure 13.6 The floating dock and the barge of Example 13.4: (a) a section at true scale, with three water levels and the waterplane at each as thick bars; (b) the metacentric height of the dock and the barge together against the water level. The dotted line is the least value in the rules of the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)10.

13.4.2 Ship lifts and building docks

A ship lift raises a ship vertically out of the water on a platform carried by wire-rope hoists along both sides. A load-monitoring system keeps the loads within what the ship and the platform can bear, and a cradle is shaped to the hull2. The capacity of a lift is stated as the largest load per metre along the centreline of the platform, and the ships that it can lift depend on how their weight is distributed along their length. Many lifts serve ships of about 1000 t, and some are built for 30,000 t or more; a transfer system ashore lets a single lift serve several berths2. The ship is lifted on a cradle or on blocks, and while the platform rises through the water the ship passes through a critical instant of its own, as it does in a dock.

A ship built in a building dock floats out of it in the way a docked ship undocks, and the ship’s least stability on the way comes when its keel has begun to leave the blocks at one end while the other end still bears on them.

13.5 Grounding

A grounding, unlike a docking or a launch, is not planned, and how the ship fares depends on the tide, the weather and the seabed. The stability of the ship depends above all on where it touches, along its length and across its bottom2. If its bottom is punctured, the flooding treated in Chapter 12 acts together with the reaction of the ground, and the residual strength of the damaged hull must be assessed as well2. A ship whose hull is still intact is a partly supported ship, like the docked ship of Sec. 13.3.

13.5.1 Aground at a point and along the keel

A ship that drives onto a bank or a rock may lift itself partly out of the water with the energy of its forward motion, and the bottom carries the difference between its weight and its buoyancy; as the tide ebbs, this reaction grows4. Where the ship touches over a small area of a smooth bottom, or rests on a rock with its hull intact, the reaction acts on it as the support of a docked ship does, with two differences. It need not act on the centreline, and it changes with the tide and with any waves. Its value is the force that brings the draught at the point of contact to the depth of water there, heeling the ship as well as trimming it when the contact lies off the centreline2. A ship stranded at the bow or the stern takes up the trim at which the moments of its weight and its buoyancy about the point of contact are equal4, the condition of Eq. (13.2).

A ship aground on a single point of its keel trims about that point as the water falls. With moments taken about a horizontal line through the contact, it is stable while a point that plays the part of the metacentre lies above G5. By similar triangles and Eq. (13.2), that point lies at Δ1/Δ\Delta_1/\Delta times the height of M1\mathrm{M}_1 above the line through the contact. On a nearly level keel it is the point M′ of Fig. 13.2(a), and the condition is again that the bracket of Eq. (13.3) be positive.

A ship aground along its whole keel, on a shoal or a sandbank that is narrow compared with its breadth, cannot trim, and its draught falls with the water. As in Sec. 13.2.4, it loses stability upright when the water falls below its critical draught unless the ground gives it support away from its keel5. Whether it then finds a heeled equilibrium, meets further ground support or capsizes depends on the large-angle moments and contact.

13.5.2 The falling tide

Let an intact ship touch a narrow support under its keel at xCx_C at high water and stay there while the water falls by a height hh. The support must hold the point C of the keel at the level of the bottom, so the ship’s draught at C falls by exactly hh. The support acts as a mass PmP_m removed at C. As in Chapter 6, the ship rises bodily by Pm/TPCP_m/\mathrm{TPC} centimetres and trims by Pm(xC−xF)/MCT1cmP_m\,(x_C - x_F)/\mathrm{MCT\,1\,cm} centimetres, by the stern if C lies forward of F. The draught at C changes by the sum of the rise and the part of the trim that falls at C, Eqs. (6.7) and (6.8), and setting this change equal to hh gives

100h=PmTPC+Pm(xC−xF)2MCT1cm⋅L,Pm=100h1/TPC+(xC−xF)2/(MCT1cm⋅L),(13.13)100\,h = \frac{P_m}{\mathrm{TPC}} + \frac{P_m\,(x_C - x_F)^2}{\mathrm{MCT\,1\,cm}\cdot L} , \qquad P_m = \frac{100\,h}{1/\mathrm{TPC} + (x_C - x_F)^2/(\mathrm{MCT\,1\,cm}\cdot L)} , \qquad (13.13)

with hh in metres, TPC in t/cm, MCT 1 cm in t·m/cm and LL the length between perpendiculars. A ship that touches from even keel has t0t_0 = 0 in the relation of Sec. 13.3.4, and the MCT 1 cm here is MCT1\mathrm{MCT}_1, that of the ship with the support counted as a weight removed, at the waterline of the moment. For a small fall it equals the ship’s own ΔmGML/(100L)\Delta_m\,\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}/(100\,L), 85.34 t·m/cm for the Series 60 ship at 7707 t computed on the hull, and the value that Table 6.1 gives with BML\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L} in its place, 86.88 t·m/cm, is about 2 % larger. The first term of the denominator is the rise of the whole ship and the second the rise of C from the trim, which grows with the square of the distance of C from F. A support near F therefore takes weight quickly, since the ship can rise there only bodily. A support near either end lets it trim, and the force grows slowly.

The Series 60 ship in its fully loaded departure condition displaces 7707 t, with KG = 5.887 m and the free surface moments that the IS Code assumes for its consumable liquids, 1573.5 t·m, and floats on even keel at 6.366 m. Table 6.1, interpolated at 7707 t, gives TPC = 14.30 t/cm and xFx_F = 56.43 m, and at that waterline KB = 3.417 m and BML\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L} = 137.47 m, so that ΔmGML/(100L)\Delta_m\,\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}/(100\,L) = 7707 × (3.417 + 137.47 − 5.887)/(100 × 121.92) = 85.34 t·m/cm. By Eq. (13.13), PmP_m grows by 2.85 t for each centimetre of fall with the support at the after end of the keel, 2.34 m forward of the AP, by 14.05 t/cm with the support at 60 m, and by 2.18 t/cm with the support under the forefoot at 120 m.

A strip and two panels in rows. Top strip: the Series 60 ship in profile at its departure draught, heights twice as large as lengths, with three small rocks under its keel, marked by a green square at the after end of the keel, an orange circle near amidships and a blue triangle under the forefoot. (a) The mass P m carried by the support, in tonnes, against the fall of the tide since the keel touched, from 0 to 2.0 m: the line for the support near amidships, 60 m, rises steeply to 2716 t at 2.0 m; the lines for the after end of the keel, 2.34 m from the AP, and for the forefoot, 120 m, rise slowly to 503 t and 438 t. (b) The effective metacentric height on the weight basis with free surfaces, from 0.456 m at no fall: the line for amidships falls steeply and crosses zero at a fall of 0.35 m, marked by a triangle; the line for the after end falls more slowly and crosses zero at 1.57 m, marked by a triangle; the line for the forefoot falls slowly to 0.227 m at 2.0 m and stays positive.

Figure 13.7 The Series 60 ship at 7707 t aground on a narrow support at three positions along its keel as the tide falls: (a) the mass carried by the support, PmP_m; (b) the effective metacentric height, with free surfaces. In the strip above, heights are twice as large as lengths. Computed on the hull with the trim free.

Figure 13.7(a) shows that PmP_m computed on the hull grows almost linearly with the fall. After a fall of 2.0 m it is 438 t with the support under the forefoot, 0.5 % more than Eq. (13.13) gives, and 2716 t with the support at 60 m, 3 % less. With the support at the after end of the keel it is 503 t, 12 % less. There the ship trims by the head, 3.58 m at that fall, its centre of flotation moves forward, away from the support, and both TPC and MCT 1 cm fall. The mass on that support grows by 2.85 t for each centimetre of fall at first and by 2.30 t at the end.

The three positions differ far more in their effect on the stability, plotted in Fig. 13.7(b). Near amidships, where the ship can hardly trim, PmP_m rises by 14 t for every centimetre, and the ship’s effective metacentric height falls to zero after a fall of only 0.35 m. A support at the after end of the keel takes weight five times more slowly, and the metacentric height remains positive until the tide has fallen 1.57 m. Under the forefoot PmP_m grows at a similar rate, but the ship trims by the stern. Its waterline widens aft and its KM rises, and after a fall of 2.0 m it still has a metacentric height of 0.227 m.

Example 13.5. Aground at the forefoot on a falling tide. The Series 60 ship in its fully loaded departure condition displaces 7707 t, with xGx_G = 59.207 m, KG = 5.8865 m and the free surface moments that the IS Code assumes for its consumable liquids, 1573.5 t·m, and floats on even keel at 6.366 m, where TPC = 14.30 t/cm, xFx_F = 56.43 m, KB = 3.417 m and BML\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L} = 137.47 m; LL = 121.92 m. At high water its keel touches a pinnacle of rock 120.0 m forward of the AP, under its forefoot, and the tide then falls 1.50 m. (a) Find the mass PmP_m carried by the support and the draughts by Eq. (13.13). (b) Computed on the hull at the waterline at which it then floats, Δm1\Delta_{m1} = 7378.80 t and KM1\mathrm{KM}_1 = 6.6462 m; find its metacentric height on both bases and the righting-moment coefficient.

Show full solution

Solution.

(a) Mass on the support. Grounding from even keel takes the ship’s own MCT 1 cm, built with GML\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L} = KB + BML\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L} − KG = 3.417 + 137.47 − 5.8865 = 135.00 m:

MCT1cm=ΔmGML100L=7707×135.00100×121.92=1,040,44512,192=85.34t⋅m/cm.\mathrm{MCT\,1\,cm} = \frac{\Delta_m\,\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}}{100\,L} = \frac{7707 \times 135.00}{100 \times 121.92} = \frac{1{,}040{,}445}{12{,}192} = 85.34\ \mathrm{t \cdot m/cm} .

The distance of the pinnacle from F is 120.0 − 56.43 = 63.57 m, and by Eq. (13.13)

Pm=100×1.501/14.30+63.572/(85.34×121.92)=1500.06993+0.38840=1500.45833=327.3t,P_m = \frac{100 \times 1.50}{1/14.30 + 63.57^2/(85.34 \times 121.92)} = \frac{150}{0.06993 + 0.38840} = \frac{150}{0.45833} = 327.3\ \mathrm{t} ,

or 2.182 t per centimetre of fall.

Draughts. The ship rises bodily by 327.3/14.30 = 22.89 cm and trims by the stern by 327.3 × 63.57/85.34 = 243.8 cm, and by Eqs. (6.7) and (6.8)

TA=6.366−0.2289+2.438×56.43121.92=6.1371+1.1284=7.2655m,TF=6.1371−2.438×121.92−56.43121.92=6.1371−1.3096=4.8275m.\begin{aligned} T_A &= 6.366 - 0.2289 + 2.438 \times \frac{56.43}{121.92} = 6.1371 + 1.1284 = 7.2655\ \mathrm{m} , \\ T_F &= 6.1371 - 2.438 \times \frac{121.92 - 56.43}{121.92} = 6.1371 - 1.3096 = 4.8275\ \mathrm{m} . \end{aligned}

As a check, the draught at the pinnacle is 7.2655 − 2.438 × 120.0/121.92 = 4.8659 m, which is 1.500 m less than the 6.366 m at which it touched.

(b) Stability. With the free surfaces, KGf\mathrm{KG}_f = 5.8865 + 1573.5/7707 = 5.8865 + 0.2042 = 6.0907 m, and GM1\mathrm{GM}_1 = 6.6462 − 6.0907 = 0.5555 m. On the hull the support carries PmP_m = 7707 − 7378.80 = 328.20 t, and by Eqs. (13.4) and (13.5)

GMe=0.5555−328.20×6.64627707=0.5555−0.2830=0.2725m,KGP=7707×6.09077378.80=6.3616m,GPM1=6.6462−6.3616=0.2846m.\begin{aligned} \mathrm{GM}_e &= 0.5555 - \frac{328.20 \times 6.6462}{7707} = 0.5555 - 0.2830 = 0.2725\ \mathrm{m} , \\ \mathrm{KG}_P &= \frac{7707 \times 6.0907}{7378.80} = 6.3616\ \mathrm{m} , \qquad \mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 = 6.6462 - 6.3616 = 0.2846\ \mathrm{m} . \end{aligned}

The righting-moment coefficient is 9.81 × 7707 × 0.2725 = 20,603 kN·m, and on the buoyancy basis 9.81 × 7378.80 × 0.2846 = 20,601 kN·m, equal within the rounding.

Comment. Computed on the hull, PmP_m is 328.20 t and the draughts are 7.243 m aft and 4.829 m forward; Eq. (13.13) lies 0.3 % below. With the MCT 1 cm of Table 6.1 instead, 86.88 t·m/cm, which takes BML\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L} in place of GML\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}, the trim term would be 63.57²/(86.88 × 121.92) = 0.38151 and PmP_m = 150/(0.06993 + 0.38151) = 332.3 t, 1.2 % above the hull; most of that error is the table’s BML\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L}. Afloat the ship had GMf\mathrm{GM}_f = 6.5463 − 6.0907 = 0.4556 m. On the weight basis the support takes 0.2830 m off the ship’s metacentric height, and KM rises by 0.0999 m, from 6.5463 m afloat to 6.6462 m at the trimmed waterline, which leaves 0.2725 m.

13.5.3 An off-centre contact

If the support acts a distance yCy_C from the centreline, positive to port, its moment PyCP\,y_C heels the ship away from it. An equilibrium heel is possible where the moments of its weight and its buoyancy about the point of contact are equal4; it must also be stable. For small angles, with heel φ positive with the starboard side down, the moments about K give

tanφ=PyCΔ1KM1+PzC−ΔKG,(13.14)\tan\varphi = \frac{P\,y_C}{\Delta_1\,\mathrm{KM}_1 + P\,z_C - \Delta\,\mathrm{KG}} , \qquad (13.14)

with P, Δ1\Delta_1 and KM1\mathrm{KM}_1 taken at the waterline at which the ship rests. The denominator is the righting-moment coefficient of Eq. (13.6). If the falling tide increases P and reduces this coefficient, the heel grows faster than the force. The coefficient depends also on the waterline and its KM; its decrease is not automatic. The small-angle estimate ceases to be reliable as the heel grows.

13.5.4 A ridge, a flat bottom and mud

The keel-line model of Sec. 13.2.4 assumes that the ship can heel about its keel, which is true on keel blocks, on a ridge of rock or on a pinnacle. Broad, firm contact with a flat bottom can restrain transverse heel; a narrow peak well above the surrounding bottom provides much less restraint4. Uneven contact, damage and a changing tide still have to be assessed. On a ridge the support stays at the keel as the ship heels, Fig. 13.8(a). On a flat hard bottom the ship must lift one bilge off the ground to heel, and the support moves out to the bilge that stays on it, where its moment resists the heel, Fig. 13.8(b). The United States Navy’s handbook for salvors describes the ground under a ship hard aground as acting like the cradle of a dry dock, which supports it against listing, while the reaction causes a virtual rise of G11.

Three panels in rows, each a box barge seen from aft in section, with the water level marked; port is on the left and starboard on the right. (a) On a ridge or a rock, heeled: the barge is heeled to starboard about its keel, which rests on the point of a triangular ridge; an orange arrow points up at K, labelled P at K by a leader. (b) On a flat hard bank, heeled: the barge has lifted its port side and rests only on its starboard bilge on a flat bottom; an orange arrow points up at the low bilge, labelled P at the low bilge. (c) In soft mud, upright: the barge stands upright with its bottom sunk a depth d below the surface of a layer of mud, shaded brown, with the water above; leaders label the water surface and the mud surface, and a label in the mud reads mud of relative density k.

Figure 13.8 A box barge seen from aft: (a) heeled on a ridge, with the support at the keel; (b) heeled on a flat hard bank, with the support at the low bilge; (c) upright in soft mud, sunk to a depth dd.

A ship that settles on soft mud at a berth as the tide falls is a third case2. Let the mud be treated as a heavy liquid whose density is kk times that of the water above it. A wall-sided barge of draught TT whose keel has just touched the mud then sinks into it by dd when the water falls by hh. Its weight is carried by the water displaced above the mud, of depth T−hT - h, and by kk times the mud displaced, of depth dd, and T=(T−h)+kdT = (T - h) + k\,d. Heeled slightly, the barge transfers a wedge of water at the water surface and a wedge of mud at the surface of the mud. The mud wedge displaces mud where there would otherwise be water, and it transfers k−1k - 1 times the buoyancy of a wedge of water of equal volume. For a wall-sided barge the two surfaces have equal second moments II, and the two transfers together act as kIk\,I. The moments about the keel of the water and the mud displaced give the centre of buoyancy2,

d=hk,KB=kd2+2d(T−h)+(T−h)22(T−h+kd),BM=kI∇,(13.15)d = \frac{h}{k} , \qquad \mathrm{KB} = \frac{k\,d^2 + 2\,d\,(T - h) + (T - h)^2}{2\,(T - h + k\,d)} , \qquad \mathrm{BM} = \frac{k\,I}{\nabla} , \qquad (13.15)

with ∇ the volume of displacement afloat. Mud of relative density 2 doubles BM while it holds the barge, and a barge that touches mud may be stiffer than when afloat. The model is idealized2, since mud does not behave as a liquid. A hull that lies in mud with no water under part of its bottom is also pressed down by the water above, Sec. 13.1.2, and seems to be held by suction until water reaches beneath it5. The two-liquid reasoning applies to a hull of any section, with the second moments of the hull at the two surfaces in place of a single II.

13.5.5 The support force from the draughts

When a ship is aground, its draughts read at the marks give the waterline at which it floats, and its hydrostatics at that waterline give Δ1\Delta_1 and B1\mathrm{B}_1. By Eq. (13.1), the force on the ground is the displacement before the grounding less the displacement at the observed waterline3. Its position follows from Eq. (13.2), with the levers measured horizontally. A ship aground is often trimmed several metres. A point of the ship at xx and a height zz then lies a horizontal distance (x−ztanθ)cosθ(x - z\tan\theta)\cos\theta forward of the AP, where θ is the trim angle, positive bow up, with tanθ=t/L\tan\theta = t/L. The factor cosθ\cos\theta is common to every lever and cancels, and for a contact on the baseline Eq. (13.2) becomes

xC=Δ(xG−KGtanθ)−Δ1(xB1−KB1tanθ)P.(13.16)x_C = \frac{\Delta\,(x_G - \mathrm{KG}\tan\theta) - \Delta_1\,(x_{B1} - \mathrm{KB}_1\tan\theta)}{P} . \qquad (13.16)

For the ship of Example 13.5, with tt = 7.243 − 4.829 = 2.414 m, tanθ\tan\theta = 0.01980, Δm1\Delta_{m1} = 7378.8 t, xB1x_{B1} = 56.447 m and KB1\mathrm{KB}_1 = 3.320 m on the hull, Eq. (13.16) gives the position of the support as 120.0 m, where the pinnacle is. With the levers measured along the ship, the balance would put it 1.26 m further forward. If the position found lies outside the part of the bottom that can be in contact, the assumed contact is wrong.

13.5.6 Exploring the falling tide (Explorer 13.1)

In Explorer 13.1 you can place a narrow support anywhere along the keel of the Series 60 ship in its departure condition and let the tide fall by up to 2 m. The explorer gives the mass carried by the support, PmP_m, the draughts at the perpendiculars, KM1\mathrm{KM}_1, the effective metacentric height with free surfaces and the righting-moment coefficient, and it marks the fall at which that metacentric height reaches zero for the chosen position. Its values were computed on the hull every 5 m along the keel and every 0.1 m of fall, with the trim free, and are interpolated linearly between those points. Try moving the support from the forefoot towards amidships and back to the stern, and watch how the fall that the ship can bear changes.

13.6 Refloating

13.6.1 Lightening, shifting weight and the neutral point

A ship aground floats again when the support force P falls to zero. The rising tide does this at the rate of Eq. (13.13), and the master can also change the ballast and loading to lift the ship clear2. Removed from the ship afloat, a mass mm at xx would lift the point C of its keel by m[1/TPC+(x−xF)(xC−xF)/(MCT1cm⋅L)]m\,[1/\mathrm{TPC} + (x - x_F)(x_C - x_F)/(\mathrm{MCT\,1\,cm}\cdot L)] centimetres, through the bodily rise and the part of the trim that falls at C. Aground, C cannot rise. The support force falls instead, by the force that would lift C by as much if it were counted as a weight removed at C, Eq. (13.13). The mass carried by the support, PmP_m, therefore falls by the fraction η of the mass removed,

η(x)=1/TPC+(x−xF)(xC−xF)/(MCT1cm⋅L)1/TPC+(xC−xF)2/(MCT1cm⋅L).(13.17)\eta(x) = \frac{1/\mathrm{TPC} + (x - x_F)(x_C - x_F)/(\mathrm{MCT\,1\,cm}\cdot L)}{1/\mathrm{TPC} + (x_C - x_F)^2/(\mathrm{MCT\,1\,cm}\cdot L)} . \qquad (13.17)

A mass removed at the point of contact reduces PmP_m by its whole amount, η=1\eta = 1. A mass removed at the position where η=0\eta = 0 leaves PmP_m unchanged; this is the neutral point of the contact, at which a load leaves the draught at C unchanged, Eq. (6.9) with x0=xCx_0 = x_C,

xn=xF−MCT1cm⋅LTPC(xC−xF).(13.18)x_n = x_F - \frac{\mathrm{MCT\,1\,cm}\cdot L}{\mathrm{TPC}\,(x_C - x_F)} . \qquad (13.18)

A mass removed beyond the neutral point, on the far side of F from the contact, increases PmP_m, since it trims the ship down at the contact by more than it lightens the ship. Shifting a weight from near the contact to a position beyond the neutral point reduces PmP_m by more than the weight moved, and taking ballast into a tank beyond the neutral point reduces PmP_m although it makes the ship heavier.

Example 13.6. Refloating a ship aground at its forefoot. The Series 60 ship, 7707 t, is aground on a pinnacle under its forefoot, 120.0 m forward of the AP, with the tide 1.50 m below the level at which it touched, and carries PmP_m = 327.3 t there by Eq. (13.13), with TPC = 14.30 t/cm, xFx_F = 56.43 m, MCT 1 cm = 85.34 t·m/cm, the ship’s own value built with GML\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}, and LL = 121.92 m. Hold 1 contains 271 t of cargo with its centre 105.68 m forward of the AP, hold 2 contains 693 t at 91.28 m and hold 5 contains 848 t at 20.90 m. Using Eqs. (13.17) and (13.18), find (a) the neutral point, (b) the cargo that must be discharged to refloat it at this state of the tide, taking all of hold 1 first and the rest from hold 2, and (c) the effect of discharging 100 t from hold 5 instead.

Show full solution

Solution.

(a) Neutral point. By Eq. (13.18),

xn=56.43−85.34×121.9214.30×63.57=56.43−10,404.7909.05=56.43−11.45=44.98m.x_n = 56.43 - \frac{85.34 \times 121.92}{14.30 \times 63.57} = 56.43 - \frac{10{,}404.7}{909.05} = 56.43 - 11.45 = 44.98\ \mathrm{m} .

(b) Discharging cargo. The denominator of Eq. (13.17) is 1/14.30 + 63.57²/10,404.7 = 0.06993 + 0.38840 = 0.45833. For hold 1,

η=0.06993+(105.68−56.43)×63.57/10,404.70.45833=0.06993+0.300900.45833=0.8091,\eta = \frac{0.06993 + (105.68 - 56.43) \times 63.57/10{,}404.7}{0.45833} = \frac{0.06993 + 0.30090}{0.45833} = 0.8091 ,

and discharging all 271 t reduces PmP_m by 0.8091 × 271 = 219.3 t, to 327.3 − 219.3 = 108.0 t. For hold 2, η = (0.06993 + 34.85 × 63.57/10,404.7)/0.45833 = (0.06993 + 0.21292)/0.45833 = 0.6171, and the remaining 108.0 t needs 108.0/0.6171 = 175.0 t from hold 2. The ship floats after 271 + 175.0 = 446.0 t have been discharged.

(c) Hold 5. For hold 5, η = (0.06993 − 35.53 × 63.57/10,404.7)/0.45833 = (0.06993 − 0.21708)/0.45833 = −0.3211, and discharging 100 t there increases PmP_m by 32.1 t, to 359.4 t.

Comment. On the hull, discharging hold 1 leaves 108.3 t on the pinnacle, and 173.9 t from hold 2 then floats it; discharging 100 t from hold 5 raises PmP_m to 358.0 t. The linear method is on the safe side here by about 1 t of cargo. Cargo discharged aft of the neutral point, 44.98 m, holds the ship harder on the rock. A tide that rises again to the level at which the ship touched would float it without discharging anything, as PmP_m falls by about 2.2 t for every centimetre of rise.

13.6.2 Freeing a stranded ship

In the idealized narrow-contact case discussed by Moore, a hull may slide off a peak when the slope of its bottom exceeds the angle of friction between hull and support4. This is not a general assurance against capsize: impalement, obstructions, damage and stability after release can change the outcome. Moore also discusses how a low tow-line attachment reduces the heeling moment near the limit of stability4. The actual release sequence requires a salvage assessment of contact forces, structural strength, flooding and stability both aground and afloat.

Lightening a stranded ship, as in Sec. 13.6.1, frees it only when the lightening is timed with the tide and the salvage gear, and until then the ship is better held still. In the damage control training of the United States Navy, a stranded ship is not to be driven off under its own power when wind and sea may work it harder aground; in most strandings anchors are laid to seaward, and the ship is weighted down rather than lightened to keep it from working on the bottom8. The Navy’s handbook for salvors adds that a rising tide reduces the ground reaction and may leave a ship whose stability has been reduced lively and in danger of capsizing, and that ballasting the ship down until the tide serves should be considered11.

When the tanker Exxon Valdez ran onto Bligh Reef in Prince William Sound in March 1989, its chief mate ran his computer program again in another way and concluded that the ship did not have acceptable stability without the support of the reef. He recommended that it should not leave the area. The master had meanwhile put the engine ahead again at about 12.35 a.m., eventually to full ahead, in an attempt to free the ship, and he kept the engine running until 1.41 a.m.12. Had the ship come off the reef, it would have lost the support on which, by the chief mate’s calculation, its stability depended.

The car carrier Hoegh Osaka developed a heavy list to starboard shortly after leaving Southampton on the evening of 3 January 2015, lost steering and propulsion and drifted onto Bramble Bank, where it lay with a list of about 40° to starboard13. The pilot stressed that it was important that the ship remain on the bank, and tugs pushed it further onto the bank and held it there13. As the tide fell, the ship’s list slowly increased13. It was refloated at high water on 7 January, and the salvors left the water that had entered the ship on board for a time because the water improved its stability13.

Neither ship rested on the narrow support of Secs. 13.5.1 and 13.5.2. Each lay on a reef or a bank over part of its bottom, the broad support of Sec. 13.5.4, whose reaction moves out to the low bilge as the ship heels and resists the heel. On such a support, a ship whose stability afloat is in doubt may be safer aground than afloat.

13.7 Launching

Docking and grounding bring a ship from the water onto a support. A launch takes it the other way, from the land into the water, and on the way it passes through stages in which part of its weight rests on the ways and the rest on the water.

13.7.1 Methods of launching

In an end launch down inclined ways, the stern usually enters first2. Large ships are often built in building docks instead, and their launch is an undocking of an incomplete ship. The weights built into such a ship must be assessed with care to find its displacement and the position of G before it floats out. Weight may have to be adjusted to keep it from floating with an excessive trim or heel, and it may need temporary strengthening2. A yard on a narrow river may launch its ships sideways. The ship is built on a level keel parallel to the bank, and at the launch it slides down ways at right angles to its keel, which tilt at their outer end and drop it into the water. The ship is sent off fast, to clear the ways before it rolls back towards them. It raises a large wave and rolls heavily, and openings that might be immersed are closed beforehand2.

13.7.2 The slip, the ways and the cradle

A ship launched end on slides into the water on a cradle. The cradle is built under it just before the launch and rests on sliding ways, which run on two greased groundways laid on the slip, parallel to the keel and about a third of the beam apart2. Where the hull rises towards the bow and the stern, the cradle is built up into the fore and after poppets. The sliding ways need enough area to keep the pressure on the grease, up to about 20 t/m² (about 196 kPa), from squeezing it out2. Until the cradle takes the weight, the ship stands on a line of building blocks under its keel, typically about 1.5 m high. They are set vertically rather than square to the slip, to make them less likely to be knocked over, and they leave room for work on the bottom, for putting the cradle in place and for keeping the forefoot clear of the slip during the launch; shores support the bilges and overhangs2. The floor of the slip, at about 1 in 20, slopes towards the water2.

The slope of the groundways, their declivity, must be steep enough for the component of the weight down the ways to overcome the starting resistance of the grease, and later the resistance of the grease and the water, but not so steep that the ship enters the water too fast. The slope of the lower stretch also sets how quickly the buoyancy and its moment about the fore poppet build up. The ways are often given a camber along their length as a compromise between these requirements2. At the launch the last shores are removed and a trigger is released, and hydraulic rams push the ship if its weight does not set it moving2. The ship is still moving fast when it is afloat. Water brakes built over its propellers and drag chains, brought into action one after another as it leaves the slip, slow the ship down before tugs take it to the fitting-out berth2.

13.7.3 The stages of an end launch

The weight and the position of G at the launch come from a detailed record of the material built into the ship, often supported by weighing2. The launch is calculated as a quasi-static operation, in which the forces and moments are taken to balance at every position. The profile of the ship is moved step by step down the profile of the ways and the waterline is drawn at each position. The buoyancy and its centre are found at that waterline from the Bonjean curves2, as in Sec. 7.7.1.

While the ship slides with its keel parallel to the ways, the stern enters the water first. The buoyancy Δ1\Delta_1 of the immersed part grows, and the ways carry the rest of the weight, Δ−Δ1\Delta - \Delta_1, spread along their length. After a certain travel G passes beyond the after end of the ways (AEW). The weight of the ship then has a moment about the AEW that would turn its stern down over the end of the ways and lift its bow off them, a motion called tipping. The buoyancy has an opposing moment about that point, and if aGa_G and aBa_B are the horizontal distances of G and B1\mathrm{B}_1 seaward of the AEW, the ship does not tip while

Δ1aB>ΔaG.(13.19)\Delta_1\,a_B > \Delta\,a_G . \qquad (13.19)

A ship that tipped would bring the whole support onto the end of the ways. Its bottom might be forced in or the end of the ways give way, and if it stopped on the ways it would be in a dangerous state as the tide fell14. The difference between the two moments is the moment against tipping, and its least value along the travel is the margin of safety. A ship with too small a margin is given longer ways or ballast right forward, either of which delays the point at which G passes the AEW. Ships have been launched safely with an adverse tipping moment, however, because their speed carried them past it14.

Further down the ways the moment of the buoyancy about the fore poppet grows until it equals the moment of the weight about that point,

Δ1bB=ΔbG,(13.20)\Delta_1\,b_B = \Delta\,b_G , \qquad (13.20)

where bGb_G and bBb_B are the horizontal distances of G and B1\mathrm{B}_1 aft of the fore poppet. The stern then lifts, and the ship turns about the fore poppet, which carries the difference between the weight and the buoyancy, Eq. (13.1), concentrated over a short length of the ship and of the slip2,14. This is the largest force on the fore poppet and may be about 20 % of the weight2. The hull, its internal shoring and the slip under the poppet must be strong enough to bear it14. The ship is now a partly supported ship with its support at the fore poppet, and its stability at this stage is found as for docking2.

As the ship travels on, the buoyancy keeps growing and the force on the poppet falls. If the buoyancy reaches the weight before the fore poppet reaches the end of the ways, the ship floats off. Otherwise its bow drops off the end of the ways, and the water there must be deep enough for the drop, bearing in mind that dynamic effects make the actual drop greater than the drop that the final forward draught implies2.

These results are drawn against the travel down the ways as the launching curves: the weight, which is constant; the buoyancy; the moment of the weight about the fore poppet, which is effectively constant; the moment of the buoyancy about the fore poppet; and the moments of the weight and of the buoyancy about the AEW2. The stern lifts where the two moments about the fore poppet meet, and the force on the poppet at that travel is the gap between the weight and the buoyancy. The gap between the two moments about the AEW is the moment against tipping14.

Historical note: launching curves

In 1899 Attwood14 described the curves of the moments about the end of the ways and about the fore poppet, from which the margin against tipping and the load on the fore poppets at the stern lift are read. He quoted the curves of HMS Sanspareil, given in Mackrow’s pocket book, for which the ship weighed 5746 tons (5838 t) and the fore poppets carried 870 tons (884 t), about 15 % of the weight14. The principle of the calculation has changed little since. Finite element analyses now allow more detailed studies of the strength of the ship, overall and near the poppets, and a simulation can move the ship down the slip step by step, with the forces and moments in balance, or follow the full dynamics of the launch2.

13.7.4 The launch of the Series 60 ship

The Series 60 ship is launched here at the lightship mass of Table 3.1, 2850 t with xGx_G = 57.58 m and KG = 6.85 m. The lightship is an assumption for this example. Where fitting-out continues after launch, the actual launching weight is generally below the completed lightship weight2; it depends on the construction stage. The ways are straight, with a declivity of 1 in 20, the keel lies 1.2 m above them on the cradle and the sliding ways, and the fore poppet bears on the ways under the point of the keel 106 m forward of the AP. The after end of the ways lies 3.0 m below the water at the tide of the launch. The travel ss is measured from the position at which the AP lies 60 m up the ways from the AEW, and the ship keeps the slope of the ways, a trim angle of 2.86° by the stern, until its stern lifts. At each position the buoyancy and its centre were computed on the hull at the waterline of that position. Afloat in this condition the ship would float at 3.269 m aft and 2.091 m forward, with GM = 1.298 m. The calculation is a balance of masses, in t, and of their moments, in t·m, which are the moments of the forces divided by gg. The moments are taken about the point at which the fore poppet bears on the ways and about the AEW, both on the ways, 1.2 m below the keel, with the levers measured horizontally. With tanθ\tan\theta = 1/20, G lies 106 − 57.58 = 48.42 m aft of the fore poppet along the keel and 6.85 + 1.2 = 8.05 m above the ways, so the lever of the weight about the poppet is 48.42 cos θ + 8.05 sin θ = 48.7616 m and its moment, divided by gg, 2850 × 48.7616 = 138,971 t·m while the ship lies on the ways. At a travel of 100 m, where G lies 17.58 m landward of the AEW along the ways, the lever about the AEW is −17.58 cos θ + 8.05 sin θ = −17.1561 m and the moment −48,895 t·m. The buoyancy at six positions of travel and the moments about the fore poppet and the AEW, from which the stern lift and the margin against tipping are found, are listed in Tables 13.2 and 13.3.

Table 13.2 Launching calculation of the Series 60 ship at 2850 t, xGx_G = 57.58 m and KG = 6.85 m, on ways of 1 in 20 with the after end of the ways (AEW) 3.0 m below the water: the buoyancy as a mass, in t, and the moments of the weight and the buoyancy about the fore poppet, divided by gg, in t·m. The row for 130 m gives the values that the ship would have if it still lay on the ways.

Travel (m) Δm1\Delta_{m1} (t) Weight Buoyancy
100 993.8 138,971 68,142
110 1432.2 138,971 93,357
115 1677.1 138,971 106,859
120 1936.6 138,971 120,833
125 2208.8 138,971 135,214
130 2492.5 138,971 149,959

Table 13.3 Moments of the weight and the buoyancy about the AEW, divided by gg, in t·m, for the Series 60 ship launched at 2850 t on ways of 1 in 20 with the AEW 3.0 m below the water. A moment about the AEW is positive for a force acting seaward of it, where the weight tends to tip the ship and the buoyancy resists tipping; the moment of the weight is negative while G lies landward of the AEW. The row for 130 m gives the values that the ship would have if it still lay on the ways.

Travel (m) Weight Buoyancy
100 −48,895 2632
110 −20,430 13,253
115 −6198 21,432
120 8034 31,862
125 22,266 44,766
130 36,499 60,342

Three panels in rows, each the Series 60 ship in profile on straight ways sloping down into the water at 1 in 20, with heights twice as large as lengths. The water is shaded on the left and the ground on the right; the after end of the ways is marked AEW with a small triangle under the water. (a) Sliding, with G still landward of the AEW: the ship lies on the ways with its stern in the water; a black arrow points down from G and a short blue arrow points up from B1, near the stern; the fore poppet is labelled under the forward part of the ship. (b) Stern lift, the ship beginning to turn about the fore poppet: the ship has moved further down, G lies seaward of the AEW and a longer blue arrow rises from B1; an orange triangle under the fore poppet marks the support, and a note reads on the fore poppet, P m equals 569 t. (c) The fore poppet at the AEW, the bow about to drop: most of the ship is beyond the end of the ways, with the fore poppet over the AEW, whose label stands to its left; a note reads on the fore poppet, P m equals 118 t; static drop 0.44 m.

Figure 13.9 The end launch of the Series 60 ship at 2850 t on ways of 1 in 20, heights twice as large as lengths: (a) sliding, with G still landward of the AEW; (b) the stern lift, when the ship begins to turn about the fore poppet; (c) the fore poppet at the AEW. Computed on the Series 60 hull.

Two panels in rows against the travel down the ways, from 40 to 170 m. (a) Masses in tonnes, on an axis labelled mass: a horizontal black line at 2850 t labelled weight, delta m equals 2850 t; a blue curve labelled buoyancy, delta m1, rising slowly from zero at 40 m, then faster, to about 2280 t at 126 m, where it bends and rises more slowly to about 2730 t at 166 m; a dashed orange line labelled on the fore poppet, P m, starting at 569 t at 126 m and falling to 118 t at 166 m; a double-headed orange arrow at 126 m between the buoyancy and the weight is labelled largest P m on the poppet, 569 t. Dotted vertical lines mark 117 m, 126 m and 166 m. (b) Moments divided by g, in thousands of tonne-metres: a horizontal black line at about 139 labelled weight about the fore poppet, ending at 126 m; a solid blue curve labelled buoyancy about the fore poppet rising from zero to meet it at 126 m; a dashed black straight line, labelled weight about the AEW at its left above the line, rising from minus 200 at about 46 m through zero at 117 m to about 25 at 126 m; a dashed blue curve labelled buoyancy about the AEW, slightly below zero until about 95 m and then rising to about 48 at 126 m, above the dashed black line. The dotted vertical lines are labelled G over the AEW at 117 m, stern lifts at 126 m, and poppet at the AEW at 166 m.

Figure 13.10 Launching curves of the Series 60 ship at 2850 t: (a) the weight, the buoyancy and the load on the fore poppet, as masses in t; (b) the moments of the weight and of the buoyancy about the fore poppet (solid) and about the AEW (dashed), divided by gg, in t·m. Computed on the Series 60 hull.

As can be seen from Fig. 13.10(b), G passes over the AEW after a travel sGs_G = 117.18 m, and from then on the moment of the weight about the AEW grows linearly with the travel. The moment of the buoyancy about that point grows faster, however, and the moment against tipping, divided by gg, is least, 22,500 t·m, after about 125 m of travel, shortly before the stern lifts. The stern lifts after a travel sLs_L = 126.29 m, with 2280.7 t carried by the water and 569.3 t, 20.0 % of the weight, on the fore poppet. The ship then turns about the poppet, Fig. 13.9(b), and the force on it falls as the buoyancy grows. When the poppet reaches the AEW, after 166 m of travel, it still carries 118.1 t, Fig. 13.9(c). Afloat, the point at which the poppet bears on the ways would lie 3.445 m below the water, against the 3.0 m of the AEW, and the bow drops at least 0.445 m off the end of the ways. The launch from 60 m of travel up to this drop can be followed in Animation 13.1.

Above, the Series 60 ship in profile, heights twice as large as lengths, slides stern first down straight ways into the water; the weight at G and the buoyancy at B1 are drawn as arrows, and after the stern lifts the force on the fore poppet is shown as well. Two lines of text give the travel and the stage of the launch, and the buoyancy and the mass carried by the ways or the fore poppet, in tonnes. Below, a graph of mass in tonnes against travel from 60 to 170 m draws the buoyancy, delta m1, as the ship goes, under a horizontal line for the weight, delta m, 2850 t; dotted lines appear where G passes over the after end of the ways, at 117 m, and where the stern lifts, at 126 m, and from there a dashed line traces the mass carried by the fore poppet, P m, falling from 569 t to 118 t when the poppet reaches the end of the ways at 166 m.

Animation 13.1 The end launch of the Series 60 ship at 2850 t on ways of 1 in 20, from 60 m to 166 m of travel, with the ship in equilibrium at each position. In the graph the weight, the buoyancy and the load on the fore poppet are drawn as masses, in t. No sound; 18 s.

Example 13.7. Launching curves of the Series 60 ship. The Series 60 ship, 2850 t with xGx_G = 57.58 m and KG = 6.85 m, is launched down ways of 1 in 20, and Tables 13.2 and 13.3 give its launching calculation. Find (a) the travel sGs_G at which G passes over the AEW, (b) the moment against tipping, divided by gg, after 120 m and 125 m of travel, and (c) the travel sLs_L at which the stern lifts, with the buoyancy and the mass PmP_m carried by the fore poppet at that travel, by linear interpolation in the tables. (d) Computed on the hull at the stern lift, Δm1\Delta_{m1} = 2280.7 t and KM1\mathrm{KM}_1 = 9.254 m. Taking the force on the fore poppet as acting at K, find the metacentric height on both bases and the righting-moment coefficient.

Show full solution

Solution.

(a) G over the AEW. The moment of the weight about the AEW changes sign between 115 m and 120 m, and

sG=115+5×61986198+8034=115+5×0.4355=117.18m.s_G = 115 + 5 \times \frac{6198}{6198 + 8034} = 115 + 5 \times 0.4355 = 117.18\ \mathrm{m} .

(b) Moment against tipping. After 120 m it is 31,862 − 8034 = 23,828 t·m, and after 125 m it is 44,766 − 22,266 = 22,500 t·m. Both are positive, and Eq. (13.19) is satisfied.

(c) Stern lift. The moment of the buoyancy about the fore poppet, divided by gg, reaches the 138,971 t·m of the weight between 125 m and 130 m:

sL=125+5×138,971−135,214149,959−135,214=125+5×375714,745=125+5×0.2548=126.27m,s_L = 125 + 5 \times \frac{138{,}971 - 135{,}214}{149{,}959 - 135{,}214} = 125 + 5 \times \frac{3757}{14{,}745} = 125 + 5 \times 0.2548 = 126.27\ \mathrm{m} ,

where the buoyancy is 2208.8 + 0.2548 × (2492.5 − 2208.8) = 2208.8 + 72.3 = 2281.1 t, and by Eq. (13.1) the fore poppet carries

Pm=2850−2281.1=568.9t.P_m = 2850 - 2281.1 = 568.9\ \mathrm{t} .

(d) Stability at the stern lift. On the hull, PmP_m = 2850 − 2280.7 = 569.3 t and GM1\mathrm{GM}_1 = 9.254 − 6.85 = 2.404 m. On the weight basis, Eq. (13.4),

GMe=2.404−569.3×9.2542850=2.404−1.849=0.555m.\mathrm{GM}_e = 2.404 - \frac{569.3 \times 9.254}{2850} = 2.404 - 1.849 = 0.555\ \mathrm{m} .

On the buoyancy basis, Eq. (13.5),

KGP=2850×6.852280.7=19,522.52280.7=8.560m,GPM1=9.254−8.560=0.694m.\mathrm{KG}_P = \frac{2850 \times 6.85}{2280.7} = \frac{19{,}522.5}{2280.7} = 8.560\ \mathrm{m} , \qquad \mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 = 9.254 - 8.560 = 0.694\ \mathrm{m} .

The righting-moment coefficient is 9.81 × 2850 × 0.555 = 15,517 kN·m on the weight basis and 9.81 × 2280.7 × 0.694 = 15,527 kN·m on the buoyancy basis, which agree to the rounding of the working; computed on the hull without rounding, the coefficient is 15,524 kN·m.

Comment. Interpolation in Table 13.2 gives the stern lift within 0.02 m of travel and PmP_m on the poppet within 0.4 t of the values computed on the hull. Afloat the ship would have GM = 1.298 m. At the stern lift the virtual loss on the weight basis is 1.849 m, and the waterline, lower aft and with the trim of the ways, has a KM higher by 1.106 m, 9.254 m against 8.148 m afloat. The poppet bears on the hull above the keel and on two sliding ways set apart, and taking its force at K gives a conservative result. Still with the force at K, the exact righting-moment coefficient of the ship trimmed 2.86° by the stern, computed on the hull, is 15,329 kN·m, 1.3 % less than Eq. (13.3) gives, since that equation takes no account of the trim.

13.7.5 Stability in the launching condition

At its launch a ship is light, and its centre of gravity stands high above its keel. Attwood14 recorded the suggestion of a metacentric height of at least 1 ft (0.30 m) in the launching condition, to be obtained by ballasting where the estimate fell short, and advised that the curve of righting levers be drawn from the cross curves in any case of doubt. The case that drew special attention to the matter was the loss of the steamer Daphne on the Clyde14.

Historical note: stability before launching

The Daphne, a steamer built by Alexander Stephen and Sons, was launched on 3 July 1883 with an unusually large number of workmen on board15. Having moved scarcely its own length from the shore, it turned over onto its port side and sank in less than three minutes16; 124 men and boys were killed17. As McGee18 reports Sir Edward J. Reed’s inquiry, the owners’ plans had been drawn by a marine engineer without training in naval architecture, who had added heavy lifting machinery and deckhouses to an earlier design, raising the centre of gravity, and had never thought of calculating the ship’s stability. Francis Elgar, engaged by the builders, found that the ship had so little stability that almost any small disturbance would have capsized it18. The builders’ history presents the inquiry and their exoneration as a turning point: since the disaster, it says, builders have always estimated the stability of a ship before launching it15.

Afloat at 2850 t the Series 60 ship has GM = 1.298 m, but at the stern lift, with 569.3 t on the fore poppet, its effective metacentric height on the weight basis is 0.555 m. Since that basis keeps the whole displacement, the righting moment of the ship is less than half of what it is afloat, and an estimate of stability at launch has to follow the launch stage by stage.

Now that the stages of a launch have been followed, we can go back to the Baaden. At its first roll the yacht was still carried mainly by the aft cradle, whose wooden blocks held the hull on both sides, and the heel probably came from that cradle dropping to port as its tyres ran off the side of the upper ramp1. Before its final roll the yacht had been backed off that cradle with its stern afloat, and the forward end of its keel rested in the small forward cradle, which did not keep it from rolling1. As the Board’s brief describes this stage, the large trim of a ramp launch makes the stern buoyant while the bow rests on a cradle, with a possible interval of negative righting lever1. The support on the centreline near the keel links this stage qualitatively to Sec. 13.2.3, where a narrow, low support reduces the righting moment; Eq. (13.4), with its small-angle and nearly level-keel assumptions, is not a numerical reconstruction of this casualty on an inclined ramp. A centre of gravity to port of the centreline gives a list that, at small angles, grows as the effective GM falls, provided that a stable equilibrium at a small angle still exists. The yacht’s margin of stability had been small before launch, since the reading of the aft starboard load cell had been recorded wrongly and its ballast overestimated1. No calculation had been made of its stability on the inclined ramp. The naval architect who had calculated its stability recommended a positive range of stability of at least 30° for a ramp launch1. The recommendation was made for this launch and is not a general launching criterion.

As can be seen from Table 13.4, docking, grounding and launching differ in where the support acts and in the stage at which the ship is checked, but each is judged by the righting moment of Eq. (13.3).

Table 13.4 Docking, grounding and launching compared. GMe\mathrm{GM}_{e} is the metacentric height on the weight basis, referred to the whole displacement Δ, Eq. (13.4); GPM1\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 is that on the buoyancy basis, referred to Δ − P, Eq. (13.5).

Operation Treatment
Where the support acts
Docking At the after end of the keel, then along the whole keel (Sec. 13.3.3)
Grounding At the point of contact, on or off the centreline (Secs. 13.5.1 and 13.5.3)
Launching Along the ways, then at the fore poppet once the stern lifts (Sec. 13.7.3)
How its force grows
Docking With the trim removed, Eq. (13.9); then PmP_m grows by about TPC tonnes per centimetre of fall, Eq. (13.11)
Grounding With the fall of the tide, fastest for a support near F, Eq. (13.13)
Launching On the poppet, largest at the stern lift and falling as the buoyancy grows (Sec. 13.7.3)
Stage checked
Docking The critical instant, the last before the shores can act (Sec. 13.3.3); the critical draught, Eq. (13.7)
Grounding The fall at which GMe\mathrm{GM}_{e} vanishes, least for a support near F (Fig. 13.7(b)); along the keel, Eq. (13.7)
Launching The stern lift, Eq. (13.20), after G has passed the end of the ways without tipping, Eq. (13.19)
Measure of stability
Docking GMe\mathrm{GM}_{e} and GPM1\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 (Example 13.2); GPM1\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 in the specification of Sec. 13.8
Grounding GMe\mathrm{GM}_{e} with free surfaces (Fig. 13.7(b)); both bases in Example 13.5
Launching GMe\mathrm{GM}_{e} and GPM1\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1, with the force on the poppet taken at K (Example 13.7)
Limit cited
Docking Largest trim on entry for a required GM, Eqs. (13.9) and (13.10); draught at landing at least 0.30 m above that at instability (Sec. 13.8)
Grounding No universal limit given here. On a narrow centreline support with no heeling moment, positive GMe\mathrm{GM}_{e} establishes local upright stability (Sec. 13.5.1); an off-centre contact heels it (Sec. 13.5.3)
Launching Historical guidance: GM of at least 0.30 m, recorded in 1899. Case-specific advice: range of at least 30° for the yacht’s ramp launch (Sec. 13.7.5). Neither is a general approval criterion.

13.8 Docking, grounding and launching in industry today

This section describes practice in 2026. Its web pages were read from 19 to 21 October 2026, and MSC.1/Circ.1348 on 4 November 2026.

Docking intervals. The International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended (SOLAS), requires every cargo ship to which the Convention applies to have the outside of its bottom inspected at least twice in any five-year period, with no more than 36 months between two inspections19, and a passenger ship to have the outside of its bottom included in a renewal survey every twelve months19. For passenger ships aged 15 years or less, other than ro-ro passenger ships, MSC.1/Circ.1348 gives guidance for accepting an in-water survey in place of an inspection in dry dock. With the Administration’s acceptance, this permits one dry-dock examination in any five-year period, with no more than 60 months between consecutive dry-dock inspections; the annual bottom inspection still applies20. Docking is expensive, and hull coatings that stay effective for longer, cathodic protection and repairs carried out afloat have made it less frequent than it was2.

Docking calculations. The United States Coast Guard’s Standard Specification 8634 asks for at least three sets of calculations, the first before the contract is awarded, the second for docking and the third for undocking, each prepared by a naval architect or a certified dockmaster or under the supervision of a professional engineer9. In the docking set, the draught at landing is found from the reaction on the after end of the keel, and the metacentric height at landing with the virtual KG of the buoyancy basis9. For the draught at instability, hydrostatic data are taken at mean draughts from 1 ft (0.30 m) above to 2 ft (0.61 m) below the mean draught on docking, and the reaction on the after end of the keel is recomputed for each. At each draught, the displacement from the curves of form less that reaction is multiplied by KM. These moments are plotted against draught, and a straight line is fitted through them. The draught at instability is read where the line reaches the moment of the weight, Δ KG, with Δ the displacement on docking; there the metacentric height on the buoyancy basis is zero9. The specification asks for the draught at landing to lie at least 1 ft (0.30 m) above the draught at instability, and for the side or bilge blocks to be hauled only after the keel has fully landed, with GM of at least 1 ft (0.30 m) and the draught at least 6 in (0.15 m) above the draught at instability9.

Floating docks and ship lifts. The rules of the American Bureau of Shipping for steel floating docks, in their edition of January 2022, ask for a metacentric height of the dock and the ship together of at least 1.525 m for a lifting capacity of up to 10,200 t and allow smaller values for larger docks, and they state that these values are minima and that the conditions in which a dock operates may call for larger ones10. Ship lifts can take the place of launching ways. The United States Navy announced in April 2023 that the launch of the littoral combat ship Cleveland at Fincantieri Marinette Marine, Wisconsin, would be the last planned side launch at that yard and that the ships to follow were planned to be launched with a ship lift21. Syncrolift, a maker of ship lifts, describes how its control systems vary the speed of each hoist motor to keep the platform level, which allows a rigid platform22.

Other ways into the water. Ships are also launched on air bags, and ISO 17682:2013, last reviewed and confirmed in 2024, gives general guidelines for such launches, covering the ship, the air bags, the slipway, the towing arrangements, the procedure and the safeguards23. Large structures are also floated off submersible barges. In an article on such operations the Malin Group notes that the stability of the barge is usually least when the water reaches the keel blocks, with the main deck fully submerged and the cargo not yet adding any waterplane; this is the stage that limits a floating dock in Sec. 13.4.1. It aims to keep GM at no less than 0.5 m, and where the submerged barge would have too little waterplane, or the water is too shallow, the barge is deliberately grounded while the cargo floats off24.

Response to a grounding. A United States regulation, 33 CFR 155.240, requires the owners and operators of oil tankers and offshore oil barges to have prearranged, prompt access, 24 hours a day, to computerized shore-based programs for damage stability and residual structural strength, with the baseline data of each vessel entered in advance. The programs must calculate at least the residual strength of the hull girder and the residual stability with compartments breached, the most favourable sequences of off-loading, ballasting or cargo transfer to improve stability, reduce hull stresses and reduce the ground-force reaction, and the bending and shear stresses caused by pinnacle loads from grounding or stranding25. The International Association of Classification Societies recommends, in its Recommendation No. 145 of May 2016, that shore-based emergency response services be able to assess the effects of a grounding, among other casualties, with the effects of time and tide, and that they be available 24 hours a day all year round26. A service should accept the details of the ship’s condition within two hours of being activated, or within one hour for passenger ships covered by IMO circular MSC.1/Circ.1400, the Guidelines on operational information for masters of passenger ships for safe return to port by own power or under tow26. Lloyd’s Register, whose Ship Emergency Response Service was set up in 1985, describes finding the reaction of the ground from the difference between the displacements before and after the grounding, with the weight of any floodwater included, and its position from the change of trim or heel27, the method of Sec. 13.5.5.

13.9 From supported ships to other craft

A floating dock loses most of its waterplane when its pontoon deck goes under, as a submersible barge does when its deck is submerged, and their stability then rests on the narrow waterplane of their walls or casings. Offshore units of semi-submersible form work in that state at their operating draught, and they are among the craft whose form or support differs from that of a conventional ship. In Chapter 14 we will look at them, together with multihulls, submarines and submersibles, and high-speed craft.

Summary

Notes on the data

The Baaden. The account follows the marine accident brief of the National Transportation Safety Board, NTSB/MAB-15/14, adopted on 23 July 2015, whose section titles are given as locators1. None of its data is used in the calculations.

The Daphne. The account of the Daphne and the historical note in Sec. 13.7.5 rest on Attwood, on the history of the ship’s builders, read in its transcription on Grace’s Guide, on the notice of an editorial of The Engineer of 6 July 1883 in the Proceedings of the United States Naval Institute, on McGee’s history of the Amsler integrator, and on the description of an illustration held by Glasgow City Archives. The report of Sir Edward J. Reed’s inquiry was published in 1883 among the parliamentary papers18; his findings are given here as McGee reports them. McGee dates the launch 28 July 1883; the builders give 3 July 1883, which agrees with the editorial of The Engineer on 6 July and is followed here.

The box barges. The barge of Examples 13.1, 13.3 and 13.4 is 54 m × 11 m × 5.5 m and floats at 3.20 m with KG = 4.20 m. Its results, the curves of Fig. 13.3 and the results of the boxes of the exercises follow from the closed forms of a wall-sided box, and the engine reproduces them. In Example 13.3 the trim on entry is found from Eq. (13.9) with MCT 1 cm of the barge afloat, 26.460 t·m/cm. Solved exactly for the trimmed box, the entry trims are 0.6379 m on the weight basis and 0.7467 m on the buoyancy basis, and the linear values, 0.6380 m and 0.7468 m, lie within 0.01 % of them. For a wall-sided box, whose waterplane does not change with the draught, the centre of flotation of the layer between the waterlines is that of every waterline, and the linear result differs from the exact solution only through the term 12BMLtan2θ\tfrac12\,\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L}\tan^2\theta of the wall-sided relation of Sec. 4.7.2, written for trim, which vanishes as the trim goes to zero.

The Series 60 ship. The hull is the Series 60 surface of Chapter 1, computed with the hull engine of Chapter 8 on 241 sections, with the waterline a plane at any heel and trim. The after end of the keel, where the cut-up of the stern meets the baseline, lies 2.337 m forward of the AP, and the forefoot meets the baseline 120.306 m forward of the AP, both from the stern and stem contours of Chapter 1. The docking condition, 3407 t, is the condition of Chapter 6 after all the cargo has been discharged from the departure condition, with xGx_G = 55.270 m and KG = 6.123 m, the values of Chapter 6 rounded to three decimals, and with no free surfaces unless stated. The draughts of the ship in Example 13.2, 4.399 m aft and 1.812 m forward, are those of Table 6.2. Computed with the hull engine of Chapter 8 the ship floats at 4.3995 m aft. The difference comes from the integration of the hull, since rounding xGx_G and KG to three decimals moves the draught aft by 0.03 mm. The fully loaded departure condition, 7707 t, with xGx_G = 59.207 m and KG = 5.887 m (5.8865 m to four decimals), is that of Chapter 3; its free surface moments, 1573.5 t·m, are the IS Code’s assumption for the consumable liquids as Chapter 11 applies it, not the actual contents of the tanks of Chapter 5 (1021.2 t·m). The KM afloat in Example 13.5, 6.5463 m, is this chapter’s integration of the hull at that condition; Chapter 5 gives 6.5458 m. Table 13.1 is computed upright and on even keel. In the docking calculation the ship is solved at each water level with the trim free and the support at the after end of the keel, and below the critical instant on even keel with P = Δ − Δ(T). The critical draughts on the keel line found in this way, 2.269 m and, with the free surfaces, 2.568 m, differ from the values interpolated in Table 13.1 by 1 mm or less.

The falling tide. Afloat, the draught of the departure condition, 6.366 m, is that of Table 6.1 interpolated at 7707 t, as the TPC and xFx_F beside it are; on the hull the ship floats at a mean draught of 6.367 m. Equation (13.13) takes the ship’s own MCT 1 cm, ΔmGML/(100L)\Delta_m\,\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}/(100\,L), formed from KB = 3.417 m and BML\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L} = 137.47 m, the values of the hull at that waterline, since Table 6.1 has no KB column; on the hull the value is 85.338 t·m/cm, printed 85.34. For each fall, the ship is solved on the hull with the trim free, and the draught at the contact equals the depth of water there; GM is corrected for the free surface moments of 1573.5 t·m that the IS Code assumes for the consumable liquids. The grid of Explorer 13.1 runs along the keel at 2.337 m and from 5 m to 120 m in steps of 5 m, and in falls from 0 to 2.0 m in steps of 0.1 m.

The floating dock. The dock of Example 13.4 and Exercise 13.8 is illustrative, a box pontoon 70 m × 19 m × 3.0 m with two wing walls 2.2 m wide and 10 m high above the bottom, whose lightweight is 1600 t at 3.40 m. The ballast remaining at each stage is taken in full compartments of the pontoon with its centre at mid-depth, without free surface, and the ship is held to the dock by side blocks. With the barge of Example 13.4 aboard, the ballast tanks are empty when the water stands 2.603 m above the bottom of the dock, where Fig. 13.6(b) begins. To float the barge in with 0.5 m of water between its keel and the blocks, the dock needs 4100 t of ballast, a little more than the 4090 t of sea water that its pontoon can hold, and its walls are taken to hold the rest.

The launch. The launching weight is taken as the lightship of Table 3.1, 2850 t with xGx_G = 57.58 m and KG = 6.85 m. The ways, straight with a declivity of 1 in 20, the height of the keel above them, 1.2 m, the fore poppet under the keel 106 m forward of the AP, the depth of 3.0 m at the after end of the ways and the starting position are illustrative. The launch is solved quasi-statically at 319 positions of travel, on the ways with the trim of the ways, and after the stern lifts with the trim at which the moments about the fore poppet balance. Dynamic effects, the friction of the ways and the bending of the hull are not included.

Numbers. Every computed number in the chapter is reproduced by scripts/ch13_check.py, from the data of data/ch13.json or from the stated inputs, and the figures and Animation 13.1 are drawn from these data.

Exercises

Under each exercise, “Show answers” opens its short answers and “Show full solution” its worked solution. Sea water has a density of 1.025 t/m³ and gg = 9.81 m/s². Heel is positive with the starboard side down, trim t=TA−TFt = T_A - T_F is positive by the stern, and positions along the ship are measured forward of the AP unless stated.

13.1 A box pontoon 40 m long, 9 m wide and 4.0 m deep floats on even keel in sea water at a draught of 2.40 m, with KG = 3.00 m. It lands on a line of keel blocks along its whole length, and the water then falls by a further 0.50 m. Find (a) the mass carried by the blocks, (b) the metacentric height on the weight basis and on the buoyancy basis, (c) the righting-moment coefficient and (d) the critical draught on the keel line.

Show answers

(a) 184.5 t; (b) 0.565 m, 0.713 m; (c) 4905 kN·m; (d) 0.949 m

Show full solution

(a) Mass on the blocks. Afloat the pontoon displaces 1.025 × 40 × 9 × 2.40 = 885.6 t, and at 1.90 m the water carries 1.025 × 40 × 9 × 1.90 = 701.1 t, and by Eq. (13.1)

Pm=885.6−701.1=184.5t.P_m = 885.6 - 701.1 = 184.5\ \mathrm{t} .

(b) Metacentric heights. At 1.90 m,

KM1=1.902+9212×1.90=0.9500+3.5526=4.5026m,\mathrm{KM}_1 = \frac{1.90}{2} + \frac{9^2}{12 \times 1.90} = 0.9500 + 3.5526 = 4.5026\ \mathrm{m} ,

and GM1\mathrm{GM}_1 = 4.5026 − 3.00 = 1.5026 m. On the weight basis, Eq. (13.4),

GMe=1.5026−184.5×4.5026885.6=1.5026−0.9380=0.565m.\mathrm{GM}_e = 1.5026 - \frac{184.5 \times 4.5026}{885.6} = 1.5026 - 0.9380 = 0.565\ \mathrm{m} .

On the buoyancy basis, Eq. (13.5), KGP\mathrm{KG}_P = 885.6 × 3.00/701.1 = 3.7895 m and GPM1\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 = 4.5026 − 3.7895 = 0.713 m.

(c) Righting-moment coefficient. By the bracket of Eq. (13.3),

9.81×(701.1×4.5026−885.6×3.00)=9.81×(3156.77−2656.80)=9.81×499.97=4905kN⋅m,9.81 \times (701.1 \times 4.5026 - 885.6 \times 3.00) = 9.81 \times (3156.77 - 2656.80) = 9.81 \times 499.97 = 4905\ \mathrm{kN \cdot m} ,

and on the weight basis 9.81 × 885.6 × 0.5646 = 4905 kN·m.

(d) Critical draught. By Eq. (13.8),

Tc=2×2.40×3.00−816=14.40−13.50=0.90=0.949m,T_c = \sqrt{2 \times 2.40 \times 3.00 - \frac{81}{6}} = \sqrt{14.40 - 13.50} = \sqrt{0.90} = 0.949\ \mathrm{m} ,

and the pontoon remains stable on its keel line until the water has fallen 1.451 m from its free waterline.

13.2 A box pontoon 40 m long, 9 m wide and 4.0 m deep, with KG = 3.00 m, floats on even keel at 2.40 m in sea water. It rests on a cradle that bears on its centreline 0.80 m above its keel and gives no restraint to heel, and the water falls until its draught is 1.90 m. Find the metacentric height on the weight basis, the righting-moment coefficient and the virtual loss of metacentric height, and compare the loss with that of a support at the keel.

Show answers

0.731 m; 6352 kN·m; 0.771 m against 0.938 m

Show full solution

Mass on the cradle and metacentre. The pontoon displaces 1.025 × 40 × 9 × 2.40 = 885.6 t afloat and 701.1 t at 1.90 m, and the cradle carries 184.5 t. At 1.90 m, KM1\mathrm{KM}_1 = 0.95 + 81/22.8 = 4.5026 m and GM1\mathrm{GM}_1 = 4.5026 − 3.00 = 1.5026 m.

Weight basis. By Eq. (13.6) with zCz_C = 0.80 m,

GMe=1.5026−184.5×(4.5026−0.80)885.6=1.5026−683.13885.6=1.5026−0.7714=0.731m.\mathrm{GM}_e = 1.5026 - \frac{184.5 \times (4.5026 - 0.80)}{885.6} = 1.5026 - \frac{683.13}{885.6} = 1.5026 - 0.7714 = 0.731\ \mathrm{m} .

Righting-moment coefficient. 9.81 × 885.6 × 0.7312 = 6352 kN·m.

Comparison. The cradle costs 0.771 m of metacentric height, and a support at the keel would cost 184.5 × 4.5026/885.6 = 0.938 m. Raising the support by 0.80 m gives back PzC/ΔP\,z_C/\Delta = 184.5 × 0.80/885.6 = 0.167 m.

13.3 A ship of 4800 t enters a dry dock trimmed 0.80 m by the stern and is to be docked on level blocks. The after end of its keel, which lands first, lies 54.0 m aft of its centre of flotation, and MCT 1 cm = 72.0 t·m/cm. At the waterline of the critical instant KM1\mathrm{KM}_1 = 7.05 m, and KG = 6.30 m. Find the mass carried by the blocks at the critical instant, the metacentric height on both bases and the righting-moment coefficient.

Show answers

106.7 t; 0.593 m, 0.607 m; 27,939 kN·m

Show full solution

Mass on the blocks. At the critical instant on level blocks the whole trim of 80 cm has been removed, and by Eq. (13.9)

Pm=72.0×8054.0=106.7t.P_m = \frac{72.0 \times 80}{54.0} = 106.7\ \mathrm{t} .

Weight basis. GM1\mathrm{GM}_1 = 7.05 − 6.30 = 0.75 m, and by Eq. (13.4)

GMe=0.75−106.67×7.054800=0.75−0.1567=0.593m.\mathrm{GM}_e = 0.75 - \frac{106.67 \times 7.05}{4800} = 0.75 - 0.1567 = 0.593\ \mathrm{m} .

Buoyancy basis. The water carries 4800 − 106.67 = 4693.33 t, and by Eq. (13.5) KGP\mathrm{KG}_P = 4800 × 6.30/4693.33 = 6.44319 m and GPM1\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 = 7.05 − 6.44319 = 0.60681 m, or 0.607 m.

Righting-moment coefficient. 9.81 × 4800 × 0.59333 = 27,939 kN·m, and on the buoyancy basis 9.81 × 4693.33 × 0.60681 = 27,938 kN·m, which differs only by rounding.

13.4 A ship of 6200 t with KG = 6.95 m is to be docked on level blocks. Afloat at entry MCT 1 cm = 95.0 t·m/cm, at the waterline of the critical instant KM1\mathrm{KM}_1 = 7.40 m, and the after end of its keel lies 58.0 m aft of the centre of flotation; take these values as constant. Find the largest mass on the blocks and the largest trim by the stern on entry if the metacentric height at the critical instant must be at least 0.15 m (a) on the weight basis and (b) on the buoyancy basis.

Show answers

(a) 251.4 t, 1.53 m; (b) 256.6 t, 1.57 m

Show full solution

Weight basis. GM1\mathrm{GM}_1 = 7.40 − 6.95 = 0.45 m. By Eq. (13.10),

Pmax=6200×(0.45−0.15)7.40=18607.40=251.4t,P_{\max} = \frac{6200 \times (0.45 - 0.15)}{7.40} = \frac{1860}{7.40} = 251.4\ \mathrm{t} ,

and by Eq. (13.9) the trim is 251.4 × 58.0/95.0 = 153.5 cm, or 1.53 m by the stern.

Buoyancy basis. By Eq. (13.10),

Pmax=18607.40−0.15=18607.25=256.6t,P_{\max} = \frac{1860}{7.40 - 0.15} = \frac{1860}{7.25} = 256.6\ \mathrm{t} ,

and the trim is 256.6 × 58.0/95.0 = 156.7 cm, or 1.57 m. The requirement on the buoyancy basis allows 3 cm more trim, because it asks for an equal metacentric height on a smaller displacement.

13.5 The Series 60 ship, 3407 t with KG = 6.123 m and no free surfaces, rests on keel blocks along its whole keel in a dry dock, and the water has fallen to 2.60 m above the blocks. Using Table 13.1, find the mass carried by the blocks, GM1\mathrm{GM}_1, the metacentric height on both bases and the righting-moment coefficient.

Show answers

667.4 t; 2.129 m; 0.513 m, 0.637 m; 17,129 kN·m

Show full solution

Mass on the blocks. At 2.60 m, Table 13.1 gives Δm\Delta_m = 2739.6 t and KM = 8.252 m, which give PmP_m = 3407 − 2739.6 = 667.4 t and GM1\mathrm{GM}_1 = 8.252 − 6.123 = 2.129 m.

Weight basis. By Eq. (13.4),

GMe=2.129−667.4×8.2523407=2.129−1.6165=0.513m.\mathrm{GM}_e = 2.129 - \frac{667.4 \times 8.252}{3407} = 2.129 - 1.6165 = 0.513\ \mathrm{m} .

Buoyancy basis. By Eq. (13.5), KGP\mathrm{KG}_P = 3407 × 6.123/2739.6 = 20,861.1/2739.6 = 7.615 m and GPM1\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 = 8.252 − 7.615 = 0.637 m.

Righting-moment coefficient. By the bracket of Eq. (13.3),

9.81×(2739.6×8.252−20,861.1)=9.81×(22,607.2−20,861.1)=9.81×1746.1=17,129kN⋅m.9.81 \times (2739.6 \times 8.252 - 20{,}861.1) = 9.81 \times (22{,}607.2 - 20{,}861.1) = 9.81 \times 1746.1 = 17{,}129\ \mathrm{kN \cdot m} .

The ship is still stable 0.31 m below the critical instant, and its critical draught on the keel line is 2.269 m.

13.6 A box barge 60 m long, 12 m wide and 5.0 m deep floats on even keel in sea water at 3.00 m, with KG = 4.50 m and slack tanks whose free surface moments total 300 t·m. It is docked on keel blocks along its whole length. Find the critical draught on the keel line with the free surfaces and without them, and the mass carried by the blocks at the critical draught with the free surfaces.

Show answers

1.953 m; 1.732 m; 772.9 t

Show full solution

Displacement. The barge displaces 1.025 × 60 × 12 × 3.00 = 2214 t, and the free surfaces raise G virtually to KGf\mathrm{KG}_f = 4.50 + 300/2214 = 4.6355 m.

Critical draughts. By Eq. (13.8) with KGf\mathrm{KG}_f,

Tc=2×3.00×4.6355−1446=27.813−24.000=3.813=1.953m,T_c = \sqrt{2 \times 3.00 \times 4.6355 - \frac{144}{6}} = \sqrt{27.813 - 24.000} = \sqrt{3.813} = 1.953\ \mathrm{m} ,

and without the free surfaces Tc=27.000−24.000=1.732T_c = \sqrt{27.000 - 24.000} = 1.732 m.

Mass on the blocks. At 1.9527 m the water carries 2214 × 1.9527/3.00 = 1441.1 t, and the blocks carry 2214 − 1441.1 = 772.9 t. The shores must be set within 1.047 m of fall after the barge lands, against 1.268 m without the free surfaces.

13.7 The Series 60 ship, 3407 t with xGx_G = 55.27 m, rests in a dry dock on a line of evenly spaced keel blocks from 10 m to 110 m forward of the AP. Assuming that the load varies linearly along the line, find the load per metre at its two ends, and the position of G at which the forward end of the line would carry no load.

Show answers

43.74 t/m aft, 24.40 t/m forward; 43.33 m

Show full solution

The line of blocks. LkL_k = 110 − 10 = 100 m, its middle lies at xmx_m = 60 m, and ee = 55.27 − 60 = −4.73 m. The mean load is 3407/100 = 34.07 t/m.

End loads. By Eq. (13.12), the loads at the ends are (Δm/Lk)(1±6e/Lk)(\Delta_m/L_k)(1 \pm 6e/L_k), with 6 × 4.73/100 = 0.2838,

waft=34.07×1.2838=43.74t/m,wfwd=34.07×0.7162=24.40t/m.w_{\mathrm{aft}} = 34.07 \times 1.2838 = 43.74\ \mathrm{t/m} , \qquad w_{\mathrm{fwd}} = 34.07 \times 0.7162 = 24.40\ \mathrm{t/m} .

No load forward. The forward end carries no load when e=−Lk/6e = -L_k/6 = −16.67 m, that is with G at 60 − 16.67 = 43.33 m forward of the AP.

13.8 A floating dock 70 m long and 19 m wide consists of a pontoon 3.0 m deep and two wing walls 2.2 m wide along its whole length. Its lightweight is 1600 t with G 3.40 m above its bottom, and the ballast it holds lies in full compartments with its centre 1.50 m above the bottom. It lifts in sea water a barge of 2300 t whose G is 4.60 m above its keel, resting on keel blocks 1.4 m high and held by side blocks. Find the metacentric height of the dock and the barge together with the water (a) at the tops of the keel blocks and (b) at the pontoon deck.

Show answers

(a) 0.681 m; (b) 0.517 m

Show full solution

(a) Water at the tops of the blocks, 4.40 m. The dock displaces 70 × 19 × 3.0 + 2 × 70 × 2.2 × 1.40 = 3990.0 + 431.2 = 4421.2 m³, or 4531.73 t, with KB = (3990.0 × 1.50 + 431.2 × 3.70)/4421.2 = 1.7146 m. The waterplane is that of the two walls, whose centroids lie 8.40 m from the centreline, and II = 2(70 × 2.2³/12 + 70 × 2.2 × 8.40²) = 21,856.7 m⁴ and BM = 21,856.7/4421.2 = 4.9436 m. The ballast is 4531.73 − 1600 − 2300 = 631.73 t, and the barge’s G lies 4.40 + 4.60 = 9.00 m above the bottom. Then

KG=1600×3.40+2300×9.00+631.73×1.504531.73=5440.0+20,700.0+947.64531.73=5.9773m,\mathrm{KG} = \frac{1600 \times 3.40 + 2300 \times 9.00 + 631.73 \times 1.50}{4531.73} = \frac{5440.0 + 20{,}700.0 + 947.6}{4531.73} = 5.9773\ \mathrm{m} ,

and GM = 1.7146 + 4.9436 − 5.9773 = 0.681 m.

(b) Water at the pontoon deck, 3.00 m. The dock displaces 3990.0 m³, or 4089.75 t, with KB = 1.50 m and BM = 21,856.7/3990.0 = 5.4779 m, and holds 4089.75 − 1600 − 2300 = 189.75 t of ballast, which gives

KG=5440.0+20,700.0+189.75×1.504089.75=26,424.64089.75=6.4612m,\mathrm{KG} = \frac{5440.0 + 20{,}700.0 + 189.75 \times 1.50}{4089.75} = \frac{26{,}424.6}{4089.75} = 6.4612\ \mathrm{m} ,

and GM = 1.50 + 5.4779 − 6.4612 = 0.517 m. The heavier barge leaves less low ballast in the dock, and the least metacentric height falls from 1.352 m with the barge of Example 13.4 to 0.517 m.

13.9 The Series 60 ship displaces 7707 t and floats on even keel at 6.366 m, where TPC = 14.30 t/cm, xFx_F = 56.43 m and MCT 1 cm, built with GML\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}, is 85.34 t·m/cm; LL = 121.92 m. At high water its keel touches a narrow support. Using Eq. (13.13), find the mass PmP_m taken by the support per centimetre of fall and after a fall of 0.80 m, with the support (a) at the after end of the keel, 2.34 m forward of the AP, and (b) 90 m forward of the AP.

Show answers

(a) 2.848 t/cm, 227.8 t; (b) 5.610 t/cm, 448.8 t

Show full solution

The constant terms. 1/TPC = 1/14.30 = 0.06993 cm/t, and MCT 1 cm × LL = 85.34 × 121.92 = 10,404.7 t·m²/cm.

(a) After end of the keel. (xC−xF)2(x_C - x_F)^2 = (2.34 − 56.43)² = 2925.7 m², and the denominator of Eq. (13.13) is 0.06993 + 2925.7/10,404.7 = 0.06993 + 0.28119 = 0.35112. The mass on the support grows by 1/0.35112 = 2.848 t/cm, and after 80 cm of fall it is 80 × 2.848 = 227.8 t.

(b) At 90 m. (xC−xF)2(x_C - x_F)^2 = 33.57² = 1126.9 m², the denominator is 0.069930 + 0.108311 = 0.178241, PmP_m grows by 5.610 t/cm, and after 80 cm it is 448.8 t. The support nearer F takes weight twice as fast.

13.10 The Series 60 ship, 7707 t, is aground at the after end of its keel, 2.34 m forward of the AP, carrying 227.8 t there; TPC = 14.30 t/cm, xFx_F = 56.43 m, MCT 1 cm = 85.34 t·m/cm, built with GML\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}, and LL = 121.92 m. Find (a) the neutral point of the contact, (b) the fraction η by which cargo discharged from hold 5, centred 20.90 m forward of the AP, and from hold 3, centred 75.80 m forward of the AP, reduces the mass carried by the support, and (c) the cargo to be discharged from hold 5 to refloat it.

Show answers

(a) 69.88 m; (b) 0.725, −0.088; (c) 314.1 t

Show full solution

(a) Neutral point. By Eq. (13.18),

xn=56.43−10,404.714.30×(2.34−56.43)=56.43+10,404.7773.49=56.43+13.45=69.88m.x_n = 56.43 - \frac{10{,}404.7}{14.30 \times (2.34 - 56.43)} = 56.43 + \frac{10{,}404.7}{773.49} = 56.43 + 13.45 = 69.88\ \mathrm{m} .

(b) Influence of the holds. The denominator of Eq. (13.17) is 1/14.30 + (2.34 − 56.43)²/10,404.7 = 0.06993 + 0.28119 = 0.35112. For hold 5,

η=0.06993+(20.90−56.43)(2.34−56.43)/10,404.70.35112=0.06993+0.184710.35112=0.725,\eta = \frac{0.06993 + (20.90 - 56.43)(2.34 - 56.43)/10{,}404.7}{0.35112} = \frac{0.06993 + 0.18471}{0.35112} = 0.725 ,

and for hold 3, η = (0.06993 − 19.37 × 54.09/10,404.7)/0.35112 = (0.06993 − 0.10070)/0.35112 = −0.088. Discharging cargo from hold 3, which lies forward of the neutral point, would press the ship harder on the ground.

(c) Cargo to discharge. 227.8/0.7252 = 314.1 t from hold 5, which holds 848 t.

On the hull. After a fall of 0.80 m, a support at the after end of the keel carries 215.6 t on the hull, 5 % less than Eq. (13.13) gives, because the ship trims by the head and its centre of flotation moves away from the support. Discharging 296.9 t of cargo from hold 5 then floats it, and the linear method is again on the safe side, by about 17 t of cargo.

13.11 A box barge 80 m long and 14 m wide displaces 2296 t, with G on its centreline 40.0 m forward of its after end and KG = 4.00 m. Aground in sea water on a rock under its centreline, it reads draughts of 2.30 m aft and 1.10 m forward. Find (a) the mass carried by the rock, (b) the position of the rock forward of the after end, with the levers measured horizontally, Eq. (13.16), and with the levers measured along the barge, and (c) the draught at the rock.

Show answers

(a) 344.4 t; (b) 66.34 m, 66.67 m; (c) 1.305 m

Show full solution

(a) Mass on the rock. The barge is wall-sided and displaces 80 × 14 × (2.30 + 1.10)/2 = 1904 m³, or 1951.6 t, and by Eq. (13.1) the rock carries 2296 − 1951.6 = 344.4 t.

The centre of buoyancy. The immersed volume is a prism of trapezoidal profile, whose centroid lies

xB1=L3TA+2TFTA+TF=803×4.503.40=35.294m,KB1=TA2+TATF+TF23(TA+TF)=9.0310.20=0.8853mx_{B1} = \frac{L}{3}\,\frac{T_A + 2\,T_F}{T_A + T_F} = \frac{80}{3} \times \frac{4.50}{3.40} = 35.294\ \mathrm{m} , \qquad \mathrm{KB}_1 = \frac{T_A^2 + T_A T_F + T_F^2}{3\,(T_A + T_F)} = \frac{9.03}{10.20} = 0.8853\ \mathrm{m}

from the after end and above the keel, measured in the barge.

(b) Position of the rock. The trim is 1.20 m on 80 m, tanθ\tan\theta = 0.015, and by Eq. (13.16)

xC=2296×(40.0−4.00×0.015)−1951.6×(35.294−0.8853×0.015)344.4=91,702.2−68,853.9344.4=66.34m.x_C = \frac{2296 \times (40.0 - 4.00 \times 0.015) - 1951.6 \times (35.294 - 0.8853 \times 0.015)}{344.4} = \frac{91{,}702.2 - 68{,}853.9}{344.4} = 66.34\ \mathrm{m} .

With the levers measured along the barge, xCx_C = (91,840.0 − 68,879.8)/344.4 = 66.67 m, 0.33 m further forward.

(c) Draught at the rock. 2.30 − 1.20 × 66.34/80 = 1.305 m.

13.12 A floating body has a constant triangular section, vertex down, and floats in fresh water at a draught of 3.658 m, its breadth at the waterline being 7.315 m. Its keel just touches a layer of mud of relative density 2, and the water level then falls by 1.829 m. Treating the mud as a heavy liquid, find how far the body sinks into the mud. Adapted from Attwood14 (public domain), converted to SI.

Show answers

1.505 m

Show full solution

The section. The half-breadth of the section grows linearly from zero at the keel to 3.658 m at the waterline, equal to the height above the keel. The area below a height zz is therefore z2z^2 per metre of length, and the body displaces 3.658² = 13.381 m² afloat.

Sinkage. With the keel a depth dd in the mud, the water surface lies 3.658 − 1.829 + dd = 1.829 + dd above the keel. The water displaced between the mud and the water surface and twice the mud displaced must equal the volume afloat,

(1.829+d)2−d2+2d2=13.381,2d2+3.658d−10.036=0,(1.829 + d)^2 - d^2 + 2\,d^2 = 13.381 , \qquad 2\,d^2 + 3.658\,d - 10.036 = 0 ,

whose positive root is

d=−3.658+3.6582+8×10.0364=−3.658+9.6784=1.505m.d = \frac{-3.658 + \sqrt{3.658^2 + 8 \times 10.036}}{4} = \frac{-3.658 + 9.678}{4} = 1.505\ \mathrm{m} .

The body sinks 1.505 m into the mud for a fall of 1.829 m, about 82 % of the fall. A wall-sided body would sink half the fall into mud of this density; the triangular section sinks further because it narrows towards the keel.

13.13 For the body of triangular section, vertex down, that floats in fresh water at a draught of 3.658 m with a breadth of 7.315 m at the waterline, and whose keel just touches mud of relative density 2 before the water falls by 1.829 m, find the metacentric height lost because of the fall, G being fixed in the body. Adapted from Attwood14 (public domain), converted to SI.

Show answers

0.845 m

Show full solution

Afloat. For the triangular section of Exercise 13.12, the area below a height zz is z2z^2, its moment about the keel 2z3/32z^3/3, and the second moment of the waterline about the centreline 2z3/32z^3/3 per metre. Afloat at 3.658 m, KB = 2 × 3.658/3 = 2.439 m and BM = (2 × 3.658³/3)/3.658² = 2.439 m, and KM = 4.877 m.

On the mud. With the keel a depth dd in the mud, the water surface lies 1.829 + dd above the keel, and the balance of volumes, (1.829+d)2−d2+2d2=13.381(1.829 + d)^2 - d^2 + 2\,d^2 = 13.381, gives dd = 1.505 m, and the water surface lies zwz_w = 3.334 m above the keel. The moments about the keel of the water displaced and of twice the mud displaced give

KB=23(zw3−d3)+2×23d313.381=23(37.06+3.41)13.381=2.016m.\mathrm{KB} = \frac{\tfrac{2}{3}\,(z_w^3 - d^3) + 2 \times \tfrac{2}{3}\,d^3}{13.381} = \frac{\tfrac{2}{3}\,(37.06 + 3.41)}{13.381} = 2.016\ \mathrm{m} .

The wedges at the water surface transfer the second moment 23zw3\tfrac{2}{3}z_w^3, and those at the mud surface (2−1)×23d3(2 - 1) \times \tfrac{2}{3}d^3, and BM = 23\tfrac{2}{3}(37.06 + 3.41)/13.381 = 2.016 m and KM = 4.032 m.

Loss. With G fixed, the metacentric height falls by 4.877 − 4.032 = 0.845 m.

13.14 A ship of 4200 t with KG = 7.00 m is launched end on. Its G lies 46.0 m aft of the fore poppet, and the fore poppet lies 40.0 m landward of the after end of the ways (AEW), all distances horizontal. At a certain travel its buoyancy is 3250 t, acting 58.6 m aft of the fore poppet, and 4.0 m further down the ways it is 3480 t, acting 57.2 m aft of the fore poppet. Find (a) the moment against tipping, divided by gg, at the first position, (b) by linear interpolation, the further travel at which the stern lifts, the buoyancy and the mass carried by the fore poppet at that point, and (c) the metacentric height at the stern lift on both bases, with KM1\mathrm{KM}_1 = 9.10 m and the force on the poppet taken at K.

Show answers

(a) 35,250 t·m; (b) 1.28 m, 3323.5 t, 876.5 t; (c) 0.201 m, 0.254 m

Show full solution

(a) Tipping. G lies 46.0 − 40.0 = 6.0 m seaward of the AEW and the buoyancy 58.6 − 40.0 = 18.6 m, and the moment against tipping is

Δm1aB−ΔmaG=3250×18.6−4200×6.0=60,450−25,200=35,250t⋅m.\Delta_{m1}\,a_B - \Delta_m\,a_G = 3250 \times 18.6 - 4200 \times 6.0 = 60{,}450 - 25{,}200 = 35{,}250\ \mathrm{t \cdot m} .

(b) Stern lift. Divided by gg, the moment of the weight about the fore poppet is 4200 × 46.0 = 193,200 t·m, and the moment of the buoyancy is 3250 × 58.6 = 190,450 t·m at the first position and 3480 × 57.2 = 199,056 t·m at the second. Interpolating,

f=193,200−190,450199,056−190,450=27508606=0.3195,f = \frac{193{,}200 - 190{,}450}{199{,}056 - 190{,}450} = \frac{2750}{8606} = 0.3195 ,

and the stern lifts 0.3195 × 4.0 = 1.28 m further down the ways, where the buoyancy is 3250 + 0.3195 × 230 = 3323.5 t and the fore poppet carries 4200 − 3323.5 = 876.5 t, 20.9 % of the weight.

(c) Stability. GM1\mathrm{GM}_1 = 9.10 − 7.00 = 2.10 m. By Eq. (13.4),

GMe=2.10−876.5×9.104200=2.10−1.899=0.201m,\mathrm{GM}_e = 2.10 - \frac{876.5 \times 9.10}{4200} = 2.10 - 1.899 = 0.201\ \mathrm{m} ,

and by Eq. (13.5), KGP\mathrm{KG}_P = 4200 × 7.00/3323.5 = 8.846 m and GPM1\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 = 9.10 − 8.846 = 0.254 m.

Symbols introduced in this chapter

Symbols defined in earlier chapters, among them φ, θ, GM, KB, BM, KM, KG, KGf\mathrm{KG}_f, GMf\mathrm{GM}_f, FSM, F, Δ, Δm\Delta_m, ∇, II, ILI_L, BML\mathrm{BM}_\mathrm{L}, GML\mathrm{GM}_\mathrm{L}, mm, xBx_B, xFx_F, xGx_G, yGy_G, TPC, MCT 1 cm, LL, BB, TT, TAT_A, TFT_F and tt, keep their meaning. Heights are measured above the baseline at K, and positions along the ship forward of the AP.

Symbol Meaning Unit
C, xCx_C, yCy_C, zCz_C point of contact of a support, its position forward of the AP, to port of the centreline and above the baseline m
PP, PmP_m support force at C, and its mass P/gP/g kN, t
Pm,cP_{m,c} mass carried by the blocks at the critical instant, before the further fall hh in Eq. (13.11) t
Δ1\Delta_1, Δm1\Delta_{m1} displacement of the supported ship at the waterline at which it floats, as a force and as a mass kN, t
B1\mathrm{B}_1, xB1x_{B1}, KB1\mathrm{KB}_1 centre of buoyancy of the supported waterline, and its position m
M1\mathrm{M}_1, KM1\mathrm{KM}_1, GM1\mathrm{GM}_1 metacentre of the supported waterline, its height above K, and its height above G m
KML1\mathrm{KM}_{L1} height above K of the longitudinal metacentre of the supported waterline m
MRM_R righting moment kN·m
M′ point on the centreline through which the support and the buoyancy act together, on the weight basis –
GMe\mathrm{GM}_e effective metacentric height of a supported ship on the basis of the whole displacement m
GP\mathrm{G}_P, KGP\mathrm{KG}_P, GPM1\mathrm{G}_P\mathrm{M}_1 virtual centre of gravity of a supported ship, its height, and the metacentric height on the basis of Δ1\Delta_1 m
GGP\mathrm{GG}_P virtual rise of G m
T0T_0, T1T_1, TcT_c free draught of a box on even keel, draught at the critical instant, critical draught on the keel line m
δtt trim removed since landing cm
GMr\mathrm{GM}_r, PmaxP_{\max} required metacentric height at the critical instant, and the largest support force that meets it, given as a mass in the examples m, kN or t
hh in Eq. (13.11), the further fall of the water since the critical instant; in Eq. (13.13), the fall since the ship touched m
w(x)w(x), LkL_k, xmx_m, ee load per metre on a line of keel blocks as a mass, its length, its middle, and the distance of G from the middle t/m, m
kk, dd density of mud relative to the water above it, and depth to which a hull sinks into it –, m
η, xnx_n fraction of a mass mm removed by which PmP_m falls, and the neutral point of the contact –, m
AEW after end of the ways –
aGa_G, aBa_B horizontal distances of G and B1\mathrm{B}_1 seaward of the AEW m
bGb_G, bBb_B horizontal distances of G and B1\mathrm{B}_1 aft of the fore poppet m
ss, sGs_G, sLs_L travel of a ship down the ways, and the travels at which G passes over the AEW and the stern lifts m

Corrections

Corrections to version 1.0, released on 3 November 2026, with their dates.

References

  1. National Transportation Safety Board. (2015). Launch capsizing of the yacht Baaden (Marine Accident Brief NTSB/MAB-15/14). Retrieved October 20, 2026, from https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/MAB1514.pdf Cited: ↑ "Accident Events" · ↑ "Vessel and Builder" · ↑ "Vessel Particulars" · ↑ "Accident Events" · ↑ "Accident Events" · ↑ "Accident Events" · ↑ "Ramp Layout and Launch Complications" · ↑ "Accident Events" · ↑ "Ramp Layout and Launch Complications" · ↑ "Accident Events" · ↑ "Accident Events" · ↑ "Accident Events" · ↑ "Damage" · ↑ "Vessel Weight, Ballasting, and Stability" · ↑ "Launch Condition Stability versus Delivered Stability" · ↑ "Probable Cause" · ↑ "Ramp Layout and Launch Complications" · ↑ "Accident Events" · ↑ "Vessel Weight, Ballasting, and Stability" · ↑ "Probable Cause" · ↑ "Vessel Weight, Ballasting, and Stability" · ↑
  2. Tupper, E. C. (2013). Introduction to naval architecture (5th ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. Cited: ↑ p. 124 · ↑ p. 124 · ↑ p. 120 · ↑ p. 121 · ↑ p. 121 · ↑ p. 121 · ↑ p. 124 · ↑ p. 124 · ↑ p. 122 · ↑ p. 122 · ↑ p. 122 · ↑ p. 122 · ↑ p. 123 · ↑ p. 115 · ↑ p. 128 · ↑ p. 126 · ↑ p. 126 · ↑ p. 127 · ↑ p. 126 · ↑ p. 126 · ↑ p. 116 · ↑ p. 116 · ↑ p. 120 · ↑ p. 116 · ↑ p. 117 · ↑ p. 116 · ↑ p. 116 · ↑ p. 117 · ↑ p. 117 · ↑ p. 118 · ↑ p. 118 · ↑ pp. 118–119 · ↑ p. 119 · ↑ p. 117 · ↑ p. 119 · ↑ pp. 117–118 · ↑ p. 119 · ↑ p. 120 · ↑ p. 118 · ↑ pp. 115 and 123
  3. Barrass, C. B., & Derrett, D. R. (2006). Ship stability for masters and mates (6th ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. Cited: ↑ pp. 301–302 · ↑ p. 303 · ↑ p. 304 · ↑ pp. 303–304 · ↑ pp. 304–305 · ↑ pp. 305–306 · ↑ p. 301 · ↑ p. 301 · ↑ p. 301 · ↑ p. 301 · ↑ pp. 308–309 · ↑ p. 302 · ↑ pp. 308–309 · ↑ p. 489
  4. Moore, C. S. (2010). Intact stability (J. R. Paulling, Ed.; Principles of Naval Architecture Series). Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. Cited: ↑ p. 74 · ↑ p. 75 · ↑ p. 75 · ↑ pp. 74–75 · ↑ p. 74 · ↑ p. 75 · ↑ p. 7 · ↑ p. 8 · ↑ p. 7 · ↑ p. 75 · ↑ p. 75 · ↑ pp. 75–76
  5. Biran, A., & López-Pulido, R. (2014). Ship hydrostatics and stability (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. Cited: ↑ pp. 28–29 · ↑ p. 151 · ↑ pp. 150–151 · ↑ pp. 151–152 · ↑ p. 150 · ↑ p. 150 · ↑ pp. 151–153 · ↑ p. 150 · ↑ pp. 28–29
  6. van Dokkum, K. (2003). Ship knowledge: A modern encyclopedia. Dokmar. Cited: ↑ p. 37
  7. Kemp, J. F., & Young, P. (2001). Ship stability: Notes and examples (3rd ed., rev. C. B. Barrass). Butterworth-Heinemann. Cited: ↑ p. 107 · ↑ p. 107 · ↑ p. 107 · ↑ p. 108 · ↑ p. 108 · ↑ p. 107 · ↑ p. 107 · ↑ p. 107
  8. Damage control training: Stability and buoyancy lessons (Lesson Topic 4.5, Docking/undocking and grounding/stranding). (n.d.). United States Navy, Surface Officer Warfare School documents; copy on the website of the Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved October 20, 2026, from https://man.fas.org/dod-101/navy/docs/swos/dca/stg4-05.html Cited: ↑ "Stability considerations" · ↑ "Grounding/Stranding"
  9. United States Coast Guard, Surface Forces Logistics Center. (2022). Dry docking (SFLC Standard Specification 8634). Retrieved October 21, 2026, from https://www.dcms.uscg.mil/Portals/10/CG-4/documents/SFLC/StandardSpec2022/SFLC-Std-Spec-8634-(2022).pdf Cited: ↑ para. A2.7.1.1 · ↑ para. A2.1 · ↑ paras A2.7.2.1 and A2.7.2.2 · ↑ para. A2.7.2.3 · ↑ paras A2.7.2.4 and A2.7.2.5
  10. American Bureau of Shipping. (2022). Rules for building and classing steel floating dry docks (January 2022 ed.). Retrieved October 19, 2026, from https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/rules-and-guides/current/special_service/11_steel_floating_drydocks_2022/dry-dock-rules-jan22.pdf Cited: ↑ paras 3-3-1/1 and 3-3-1/3 · ↑ para. 3-3-1/3 · ↑ para. 3-3-1/3
  11. Naval Sea Systems Command. (2000). U.S. Navy salvor’s handbook (S0300-A7-HBK-010, Rev. 1). United States Navy. Retrieved October 19, 2026, from https://legacy.maritime.org/doc/pdf/salvorshandbook.pdf Cited: ↑ Section 2-5.1, p. 2-9 · ↑ Section 2-5.5, p. 2-11
  12. Alaska Oil Spill Commission. (1990). Spill: The wreck of the Exxon Valdez (Final report, pp. 5–14). State of Alaska. Reprinted by the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council. Retrieved October 25, 2026, from https://evostc.state.ak.us/oil-spill-facts/details-about-the-accident/ Cited: ↑ pp. 5–14
  13. MAIB. (2016). Report on the investigation into the listing, flooding and grounding of Hoegh Osaka, Bramble Bank, The Solent, UK on 3 January 2015 (Report No. 6/2016). Marine Accident Investigation Branch. Retrieved October 8, 2026, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/56e9a7afe5274a14d9000000/MAIBInvReport6_2016.pdf Cited: ↑ Synopsis and Section 1.3.4 · ↑ Sections 1.3.4 and 1.3.6 · ↑ Section 1.3.6 · ↑ Section 1.3.7
  14. Attwood, E. L. (1899). Text-book of theoretical naval architecture. Longmans, Green, and Co. (Public domain.) Cited: ↑ pp. 253–254 · ↑ p. 254 · ↑ p. 255 · ↑ pp. 255–256 · ↑ pp. 254–255 · ↑ pp. 254–255 · ↑ pp. 255–256 · ↑ p. 253 · ↑ pp. 252–253 · ↑ p. 85 · ↑ p. 131
  15. Alexander Stephen and Sons. (1932). A shipbuilding history, 1750–1932 (Chapter 4). Transcribed on Grace’s Guide. Retrieved October 19, 2026, from https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/A_Shipbuilding_History._1750-1932_(Alexander_Stephen_and_Sons):_Chapter_4 Cited: ↑ Chapter 4 · ↑ Chapter 4
  16. United States Naval Institute. (1883). Bibliographic notices. Proceedings of the United States Naval Institute, 9(5). Retrieved October 21, 2026, from https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1883/december/bibliographic-notices Cited: ↑ "The catastrophe on the Clyde"
  17. TheGlasgowStory. (n.d.). Daphne disaster [Illustration from the Bailie, 11 July 1883, Mitchell Library, Glasgow City Archives]. Retrieved October 21, 2026, from https://www.theglasgowstory.com/image/?inum=TGSW00005 Cited: ↑
  18. McGee, D. (1998). The Amsler integrator and the burden of calculation. Material History Review, 48. Retrieved October 21, 2026, from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/MCR/article/view/17794 Cited: ↑ para. 54 · ↑ para. 53 · ↑ para. 53
  19. IMO. (2024). SOLAS: Consolidated edition 2024 (Sales No. IH110E). International Maritime Organization. Cited: ↑ reg. I/10(a)(v) · ↑ regs I/7(a)(ii) and I/7(b)(ii)
  20. IMO. (2010, June 2). Guidelines for the assessment of technical provisions for the performance of an in-water survey in lieu of bottom inspection in dry-dock to permit one dry-dock examination in any five-year period for passenger ships other than ro-ro passenger ships (MSC.1/Circ.1348). International Maritime Organization. Retrieved November 4, 2026, from https://media.liscr.com/marketing/liscr/media/liscr/online%20library/maritime/msc.1-circ.1348%20passenger%20vessel%20in-water%20survey%20in%20lieu%20of%20bottom%20inspection%20in%20dry-dock.pdf Cited: ↑ annex, paras 1.1 and 1.4
  21. United States Navy. (2023, April 14). Navy to christen future U.S. Navy ship Cleveland [Press release]. Retrieved October 19, 2026, from https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/Press-Releases/display-pressreleases/Article/3363108/navy-to-christen-future-us-navy-ship-cleveland/ Cited: ↑
  22. Stokoe, G. (2024, April 30). Syncrolift makes dynamic launching a thing of the past. Syncrolift. Retrieved October 19, 2026, from https://syncrolift.com/in-focus/syncrolift-makes-dynamic-launching-a-thing-of-the-past Cited: ↑
  23. ISO. (2013). Ships and marine technology: Methodology for ship launching utilizing air bags (ISO Standard No. 17682:2013; reviewed and confirmed in 2024). International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved October 20, 2026, from https://www.iso.org/standard/60260.html Cited: ↑
  24. Malin Group. (2026, February 2). Intricacies of float-on/off operations. Retrieved October 19, 2026, from https://malingroup.com/2026/02/02/intricacies-of-float-on-off-operations-2/ Cited: ↑
  25. Damage stability information for oil tankers and offshore oil barges, 33 C.F.R. 155.240 (2026). Retrieved October 19, 2026, from https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-33/chapter-I/subchapter-O/part-155/subpart-B/section-155.240 Cited: ↑
  26. IACS. (2016). Recommendation for the operation of shore-based emergency response services (Recommendation No. 145). International Association of Classification Societies. Copy on the website of the Indian Register of Shipping. Retrieved October 20, 2026, from https://www.irclass.org/media/1773/recommendation_no_145_-may-2016-recommendation_for_the_operation.pdf Cited: ↑ paras 2.4, 3.1 and 4.3 · ↑ paras 1.1 and 3.2
  27. Prentice, D., Peiris, W., & Brown, N. (2014, December). Modelling ships in danger. Ingenia, (61). Retrieved October 19, 2026, from https://ingenia.org.uk/articles/modelling-ships-in-danger/ Cited: ↑